top | item 32678877

(no title)

whisps | 3 years ago

discuss

order

restingrobot|3 years ago

So the courts decide calling the family and the store racist was libel and slanderous, and it was upheld after sever appeals. Despite that, you are trying to claim that the Gibson's are racist? I don't understand what point you're making. I'm sure these comments were taken into account in the court proceedings and decisions, so why bring it up here. I'm not condoning what was said, but this puts nothing in a new light, as the court already ruled on what you are claiming.

ensignavenger|3 years ago

I suppose that depends entirely on what "*" is blanking out. Given the context, the grand-kid seems to be upset at the protestors. If "*" is a racist slur, then yeah... (still says nothing for sure about the parents or grand parents, though) but if it is just some general swear word, then he sounds more like an angry person with a potty mouth.

elmomle|3 years ago

Sometimes the court can uphold the law and yet an undesirable state of affairs can persist. Those comments were racist, and furthermore it seems the family has not acknowledged that fact or apologized for it. This would definitely affect my likelihood of shopping there--all else being equal, I'd greatly prefer to have business owners in my community who don't espouse racist beliefs.

iepathos|3 years ago

The facebook posts made by Allyn Gibson make it clear he is racist, which is how he earned that reputation. The court didn't hold Oberlin College responsible to pay because Allyn wasn't racist, he is racist. They held the college responsible because an administrator was on site for the protests and handing out fliers making it seem as though the college endorsed the protests. If that administrator had not been there, the college would not be responsible for any damages as it's otherwise perfectly legal for any of its students to protest anything they like including racist individuals and their family establishments.

whisps|3 years ago

[deleted]

anoonmoose|3 years ago

In my opinion, the statement "not my fault most black ppl around my area suck" is pretty racist. Most people in my life would as well. The court's ruling, and the laws and rules and standards they used to make it, do not dictate the way me or mine form our opinions. There's a reading of this story where there could also be outrage at punishment for calling a racist a racist.

asjldkfin|3 years ago

I recommend people click into the link and read the full quote.

The quote snippet is out of context and feels like its done strategically.

kurisufag|3 years ago

those asterisks are downright deceptive -- the character count and image suggests it's "fucks", but at first glance it reads as something a lot worse

rlewkov|3 years ago

Maybe 100% of students choose to never again patronize the bakery and think that Oberlin shouldn't have to pay the judgement ... tough, not relevant.

space_fountain|3 years ago

Uhm, this comment section is literally full of people attacking the students for exactly that and this article puts a frame on things that makes it clear that they may well have been reasonable. Like idk as someone said the court made a decision, but I would judge this kid to be racist based on the statements in the article. And yes I did read the article. That is totally relevant