top | item 32680752

(no title)

daenz | 3 years ago

That's not difficult to comprehend at all. It sounds like you're not comprehending my point.

discuss

order

unethical_ban|3 years ago

You shifted the goalposts into a false dichotomy about "public vs. private" and the concept of de-stigmatization. I am saying the entire premise is bunk, there is not only "private" and "public".

There is clearly a definition of "public" that involves a limited, semi-unrestricted number of like-minded people in a safe setting without tools to record behavior for eternal and unlimited rebroadcast. You do not acknowledge this; you are talking in binary.