top | item 32726679

Draw Anything – A Simple Stable Diffusion Playground

159 points| kierangill | 3 years ago |drawanything.app

105 comments

order
[+] leobg|3 years ago|reply
I’m getting NSFW warning. On the sample prompt provided by the app itself:

> Photo realistic oil painting of a baby wearing a bib sitting at a wooden table in front of an egg. Painting by Leonardo da Vinci in the style tof mona lisa (1519). The baby has a Laughing expression. Medium shot with a tilted frame. The person is to the left of the table. Warm lighting. Photorealism.

[+] eruci|3 years ago|reply
Same for me. Got an NSFW warning for "A ten year old boy daydreaming"
[+] frx|3 years ago|reply
Seems to be the word "baby". It worked for me after removing it.
[+] simlevesque|3 years ago|reply
Same for me. I don't even understand what could be detected as NSFW
[+] mach1ne|3 years ago|reply
For me it complains about NSFW when I ask a smirking expression on the face of the example prompt. I wonder if this is using some special NSFW filter?
[+] capableweb|3 years ago|reply
I don't understand how these various AI companies even try to filter NSFW content. The world contains NSFW, trying to avoid it by "filtering" is a effort not worth taking, the undertaking is huge and filled with pitfalls and false-positives.
[+] wrthfl|3 years ago|reply
Same for me. Pretty much any prompt I tried produced a nsfw error...
[+] jakear|3 years ago|reply
It marks it NSFW about half the time with 100% stock input for me.
[+] waynesonfire|3 years ago|reply
broken for me too. wouldn't render a smiley face. "draw anything" is misleading.
[+] seydor|3 years ago|reply
yeeah it seems maybe 'baby' triggers the nsfw filter?
[+] jamil7|3 years ago|reply
Just prompt it again, did that for me every once in a while too.
[+] andai|3 years ago|reply
smiling forest: ok

smiling forest, photorealism: nsfw detected

[+] donatj|3 years ago|reply
Why do all of these tools block everything NSFW?

What I want more than anything is to see what kind of horrifying H.R. Geiger imagery these things can come up with.

[+] yreg|3 years ago|reply
https://dezgo.com/ doesn't.

Only the author knows their reasons for this specific case, but in general it seems internet services tend to follow american conservative views on nudity. I mean why is it strictly forbidden to post a topless photo on almost any mainstream social network again?

Another reason is liability, in case the model truly happens to generate something that might be illegal in author's jurisdiction and they are afraid of ever so shortly storing the image on their server.

[+] pwinnski|3 years ago|reply
SD had a single user show up and discover how good the model was at generating gore, and suddenly many, many users showed up to generate gory pictures, and every channel was filled with gory pictures until they put in overly-broad keyword filters to stem the flood.

They've been really open about why they're doing what they're doing on the regularly weekly "office hours" Discord audio chats.

[+] bioemerl|3 years ago|reply
This is just something you have to accept, because if these sites did not block not safe for work content everyone using them would almost immediately start using it to generate nude images of the people they know in real life and other very scummy things.

In the long run this is something we're just going to have to learn to deal with as a society, here is a new power we have and it's not going back in the bottle.

But in the short run having these filters is a good way to slow down the inevitable and give us a little bit more time to adapt to this new reality.

In the meantime, you can run it yourself and I think that's a perfectly fine compromise.

[+] FloatArtifact|3 years ago|reply
> Why do all of these tools block everything NSFW?

> What I want more than anything is to see what kind of horrifying H.R. Geiger imagery these things can come up with.

Why does Google have a safe mode? Sorry, people should have the option for unwanted content.

I would like to show these projects off to friends and co-workers without the risk of generating explicit content.

These generators need settings to toggle such behavior.

[+] timolins|3 years ago|reply
You can make a killer party-game out of this.

Like Drawful [1] or Quickplash [2], but enhanced by AI. Everyone gets a task and has to come up with the best prompt or drawing.

I feel like this would be fun so play, even if you can't draw.

[1] https://www.jackboxgames.com/drawful-two/

[2] https://www.jackboxgames.com/quiplash/

[+] CarlsJrMints|3 years ago|reply
I recently made a game pretty much just like this. It's like a game of Drawful mixed with telephone so you can see how the image changes through cycles of AI drawing and human interpretation.

http://www.dallestrations.com/

[+] biztos|3 years ago|reply
Not to pile on to the NSFW complaint, or maybe yes, I found this one pretty funny (SFW):

https://imgur.com/a/GXaf9kH

But yeah, bounce. I think this will be a big enough factor in the “AI” thing that whoever comes up with a filter combo to just not generate things Americans fear, regardless of the input, will win big.

[+] kierangill|3 years ago|reply
I posted this as a reply but I'll surface it again:

This was my Labour Day weekend hack. Source is gross. I'm going to keep it off my Github for now. But it's not hard to build from scratch.

Tech:

SvelteKit

Supabase

Replicate

Fabric JS/TLDraw

I did not intend for this to drain my wallet so I may start limiting requests to authenticated users.

I'm going to be posting updates on my Twitter[0].

[0]: https://twitter.com/KieranGilliam

[+] yreg|3 years ago|reply
I'm a bit sorry that we are all complaining about the filter.

Other than that, both the idea and the app is pretty neat, congratulations!

[+] russellbeattie|3 years ago|reply
OP, looks good. I'm on a tablet - being able to zoom in so I can use my pen would be nice. (Unless I'm missing something).
[+] kierangill|3 years ago|reply
Yeah that should be supported. I must've missed something on my end. What kind of tablet are you using?
[+] coolness1776|3 years ago|reply
Photo realistic oil painting of a baby wearing a bib sitting at a wooden table in front of an egg. Painting by Leonardo da Vinci in the style tof mona lisa (1519). The baby has a Laughing expression. Medium shot with a tilted frame. The person is to the left of the table. Warm lighting. Photorealism.
[+] dzek69|3 years ago|reply
angry face gave me nsfw warning, i tried again without changing anything (as suggested) and i got this:

https://i.vgy.me/VEYd13.png

omg i laughed so loud :D

so realistic, Leonardo would be proud :D

[+] spuz|3 years ago|reply
I can't seem to generate anything other than a blank image. Any suggestions?
[+] alpineidyll3|3 years ago|reply
Well done little app. I assume it's a project for funsies? source?
[+] kierangill|3 years ago|reply
For fun! It was my Labour Day weekend hack. Source is gross. I'm going to keep it off my Github for now. But it's not hard to build from scratch.

Tech:

SvelteKit

Supabase

Replicate

Fabric JS/TLDraw

[+] darepublic|3 years ago|reply
I want to generate pictures of myself living laughing and loving life for a dating profile. Which model will let me do that?
[+] andai|3 years ago|reply
DALLE detects realistic faces in input and refuses to proceed, but if you erase the face it will happily generate a new one in its place.
[+] purim|3 years ago|reply
wow i changed the "baby's expression is happy" and it refused to dream because its NSFW?

so I changed it to man and it generated something totally random and unrelated.

I'm not sure that this stable diffusion tool can replace illustrators in this current state but more of a tool they can utilize or not.

[+] najarvg|3 years ago|reply
yes "happy" "gleeful" "joyful" everything was NSFW with "baby" but replacing "baby" with "infant" works fine is what I observed
[+] zipotm|3 years ago|reply
"smiling sun above fairy mountain"

Could not generate: NSFW content detected, please try a different prompt

[+] bot41|3 years ago|reply
"Disgusted" gave a NSFW error. "Horrified" worked but the result was awful.
[+] wutbrodo|3 years ago|reply
Horrified gave me a NSFW error
[+] parksy|3 years ago|reply
I used the default inputs and got an NSFW detected warning on my first try.
[+] darepublic|3 years ago|reply
After clicking generate on the sample prompt getting NSFW warning.
[+] Hard_Space|3 years ago|reply
Pretty much everything you can put in is marked NSFW. Unusable.