My view of the human brain at this point is a massive excel spreadsheet.
Some cells depend on others. Some dont. Change one cell and it usually has an effect on others. Some changes are instantaneous, some takes longer. Some take long enough that you can't figure what caused this effect.
The only difference vs excel is here is we only get to see the cells, and their values, not the formulae behind it. And we are systematically trying to reverse engineer the formulae from the changes we see. We find some patterns, think its a formula, only to later find a contradiction, and that we don't know enough of the formulae yet. In some cases, the contradictions haven't been found just yet.
Ya, cool metaphor. Boids meets reactive programming.
In a book stuffed with ideas, Lingua ex Machina: Reconciling Darwin and Chomsky [2001] had two metaphors that have stuck with me.
There are Darwinian processes within the brain. Like your ear hears some noise, could be interpreted as either "cap" or "cat", those two possibilities fight it out until one wins.
There's a song, some kind of pattern sequence, weaving back and forth, which might be how parts of the brain intracommunicate, which might be how memories are encoded and retrieved (and may also explains why memories are changed by being recalled).
Interesting. I wonder how common miscalibrations are. Personally I've noticed that my overall impression of experiences is usually much more positive than they should be. I'll think back to, say, a business trip I didn't want to take and think of it fondly even though almost every individual memory I have of it I was either bored or miserable.
> Personally I've noticed that my overall impression of experiences is usually much more positive than they should be.
I envy you a little bit.
I've noticed that my overall impression of experiences is usually extremely negative, as no matter how many positive memories I have, the negative experiences always overwhelm me so much that the positive ones don't even feel real.
I remember going to a vacation, and while there were a few pleasant moments, I can't really recall them and re-experience them - I just know rationally that they did happen. But recalling unpleasant moments brings all the unpleasantness back to the present moment.
I have been training for almost a decade to flag all experiences as positive. It works; things that were objectively bad (chemo, having covid, getting robbed, business partner stealing money from the company, horrible clients etc) are all positive memories in my head. The only thing that I couldn’t manage was my dogs death; he was mauled to death by a pitbull right in front of me. I used to be quite a negative person and many earlier memories that were not that terrible are all giving me over the top bad feelings: when my grandfather died, I was wallowing so much in negativity that I decided to stop doing that once and for all. It works: live feels very positive and nice even though it of course often is not.
“In sum, we have identified NT (neurotensin) as a neuropeptide that signals valence in the BLA (basolateral amygdala) and showed that NT is a critical neuromodulator that orchestrates positive and negative valence assignment in amygdala neurons by extending valence-specific plasticity to behaviourally relevant timescales.”
I notice AI generated artwork is very good at getting an accurate main subject of the artwork, but seems to lack having small sized details of an image be consistent with the broad message
Things like having a waterfall on the positive side seem very human to me and I doubt it was done by AI
Quanta has the following roles [1], though I wonder how much duplication there is given that several cite "illustration" :
- Art Director
- Graphics Editor
- Visual Designer
Once these AI/ML tools become better, I think a lot of magazines and news orgs will lower their staffing for this role and redeploy the capital to other efforts.
Hopefully existing illustrators can stay on board and work in other creative areas.
Related, does this happen to anyone else: you're going about your day, then a random memory comes to you? My theory is something subtle/unconscious makes me remember it (something I saw or felt). I asked my wife if it happens to her, but she said no. Happens to me a few times a week.
I get this semi-frequently, though almost exclusively those with negative emotions attached to them. It has either contributed to, been the cause of, or an effect of (or combination) chronic depression for over half of my life now.
Between medication and some therapy, I'm stable and high functioning, though I feel like I'm always one traumatic experience away from losing it.
I wish I could donate my active brain to science as it feels like there is clearly something not quite well adjusted about it, but alas, I'm still using it (most of the time anyway).
Yep, happens to me all the time. Since introducing psychedelics into my life I’ve been able to gain more awareness of this and can usually trace things back to what triggered the memory. Like a smell, or a food, music, or a pile of mail/clutter sitting on the counter, an advertisement, etc. I’ve been on a declutter/organization mission lately to help mitigate this. Out of sight, out of mind, as they say.
> Those feelings aren’t just linked to the memory; they are part of it: The brain assigns an emotional “valence” to information as it encodes it, locking in experiences as good or bad memories.
I have doubts about the "locking" part. Many of my memories don't age well: as I revisit them I find that what felt like good memories, in fact weren't.
Sometimes it's because I changed my mind; but often it's because I forced myself to enjoy something I actually didn't care for, and as time passes my willingness to fake enjoyment, fades.
Funny thing, every time I'm using an umbrella, it seems to be raining! Neuroscience is plagued by poor philosophy of mind, someday it'll do better I hope.
I just feel like brain science is such a shit show that we really need to wait at least 20 years to find out if any of this is really true. Very cool to read about but I feel like we should remain extremely skeptical of everything out of that field
[+] [-] gofreddygo|3 years ago|reply
Some cells depend on others. Some dont. Change one cell and it usually has an effect on others. Some changes are instantaneous, some takes longer. Some take long enough that you can't figure what caused this effect.
The only difference vs excel is here is we only get to see the cells, and their values, not the formulae behind it. And we are systematically trying to reverse engineer the formulae from the changes we see. We find some patterns, think its a formula, only to later find a contradiction, and that we don't know enough of the formulae yet. In some cases, the contradictions haven't been found just yet.
Theory after theory, change after change.
[+] [-] specialist|3 years ago|reply
In a book stuffed with ideas, Lingua ex Machina: Reconciling Darwin and Chomsky [2001] had two metaphors that have stuck with me.
There are Darwinian processes within the brain. Like your ear hears some noise, could be interpreted as either "cap" or "cat", those two possibilities fight it out until one wins.
There's a song, some kind of pattern sequence, weaving back and forth, which might be how parts of the brain intracommunicate, which might be how memories are encoded and retrieved (and may also explains why memories are changed by being recalled).
https://www.amazon.com/Lingua-Machina-Reconciling-Darwin-Cho...
I also remain enthralled by the notion that our brains are prediction engines. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Intelligence https://www.amazon.com/Thousand-Brains-New-Theory-Intelligen...
I want some kind of synthesis of your spreadsheet and Hawkins' prediction engine metaphors to be true. That'd be cool.
[+] [-] skohan|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] polishdude20|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] causality0|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bheadmaster|3 years ago|reply
I envy you a little bit.
I've noticed that my overall impression of experiences is usually extremely negative, as no matter how many positive memories I have, the negative experiences always overwhelm me so much that the positive ones don't even feel real.
I remember going to a vacation, and while there were a few pleasant moments, I can't really recall them and re-experience them - I just know rationally that they did happen. But recalling unpleasant moments brings all the unpleasantness back to the present moment.
I really wish it was the other way around.
[+] [-] tluyben2|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] davidhay|3 years ago|reply
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollyanna_principle
[+] [-] NavinF|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] djoshea|3 years ago|reply
“In sum, we have identified NT (neurotensin) as a neuropeptide that signals valence in the BLA (basolateral amygdala) and showed that NT is a critical neuromodulator that orchestrates positive and negative valence assignment in amygdala neurons by extending valence-specific plasticity to behaviourally relevant timescales.”
[+] [-] pcthrowaway|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] quantumsequoia|3 years ago|reply
Things like having a waterfall on the positive side seem very human to me and I doubt it was done by AI
[+] [-] echelon|3 years ago|reply
- Art Director
- Graphics Editor
- Visual Designer
Once these AI/ML tools become better, I think a lot of magazines and news orgs will lower their staffing for this role and redeploy the capital to other efforts.
Hopefully existing illustrators can stay on board and work in other creative areas.
[1] https://www.quantamagazine.org/about/
[+] [-] zeknife|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] siavosh|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zdragnar|3 years ago|reply
Between medication and some therapy, I'm stable and high functioning, though I feel like I'm always one traumatic experience away from losing it.
I wish I could donate my active brain to science as it feels like there is clearly something not quite well adjusted about it, but alas, I'm still using it (most of the time anyway).
[+] [-] whalesalad|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bambax|3 years ago|reply
I have doubts about the "locking" part. Many of my memories don't age well: as I revisit them I find that what felt like good memories, in fact weren't.
Sometimes it's because I changed my mind; but often it's because I forced myself to enjoy something I actually didn't care for, and as time passes my willingness to fake enjoyment, fades.
[+] [-] bl4ckm0r3|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Gatsky|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pupperino|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dmarchand90|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mountainriver|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] danielunited|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] andsoitis|3 years ago|reply