My impression with arxiv is that it's for after the paper has been reviewed to make the information as widely as accessible as possible. I'm more interested in places that would review the paper in the first place.
Yes, like said. Also I did not see your first draft of writing before. First which comes to my mind when seeing it: It seems you are not referencing any existing work of scientists, which will be a large caveat for many, because that is like science works – enhance what others have done, prove your starting or side points of your arguments by citing what others found, do not do everything from scratch.
Don't write about what you think something is like (e.g. NN), but prove it is like that by citing the right sources, which you have read.
peterweyand|3 years ago
foothebar|3 years ago