It would be a stunning twist of irony if this website uploaded images to a proprietary image dataset used for training AI models, pitching "uncorrelated data"
That highlights one of my "concerns" about AI training sets. There seems to be a very real risk of accidentally adding an image that you have no rights to, so what happens if someone finds out and demand their image removed from all models trained on that image?
You can't really back an image out of a model, you can only retrain without that image.
Creative Commons should add a new license that prohibits the use of ones work to train AI.
Because Creative Commons really needs another non-open license variant like non-commercial that no one really understands what they allow and don't allow so you're better off just not using them if you're being conservative. </s>
We are building an opt-in list, because a lot of people do want to be able to prompt AI with something like, "a cat in the style of me" or "me riding a dinosaur". That will be shared publicly, of course.
mrweasel|3 years ago
You can't really back an image out of a model, you can only retrain without that image.
Creative Commons should add a new license that prohibits the use of ones work to train AI.
ghaff|3 years ago
simandl|3 years ago
We are building an opt-in list, because a lot of people do want to be able to prompt AI with something like, "a cat in the style of me" or "me riding a dinosaur". That will be shared publicly, of course.