top | item 32941932 (no title) joseluis | 3 years ago Having both approaches available would be better IMHO. Builder pattern is very nice but I frequently miss having named arguments too. Even if macros can partially fullfill that need, it's not the same and introduces more quirks and complexity... discuss order hn newest Ygg2|3 years ago Problem with named parameters is that they make renaming function params a breaking change. metaltyphoon|3 years ago Unless the IDE doesn’t support this refactoring? It’s ridiculously easy in C# and VS or VSC. load replies (2) maxbond|3 years ago Fair enough.
Ygg2|3 years ago Problem with named parameters is that they make renaming function params a breaking change. metaltyphoon|3 years ago Unless the IDE doesn’t support this refactoring? It’s ridiculously easy in C# and VS or VSC. load replies (2)
metaltyphoon|3 years ago Unless the IDE doesn’t support this refactoring? It’s ridiculously easy in C# and VS or VSC. load replies (2)
Ygg2|3 years ago
metaltyphoon|3 years ago
maxbond|3 years ago