(no title)
solarparade | 3 years ago
It doesn't even have to be that complex, for a super GM even just a simple signal that indicates "this position has a crushing move, spend extra time thinking on this move" is enough to significantly improve their performance
Unless you catch the method of cheating directly, it's basically impossible to definitively determine if someone was cheating from a small number of games, they could just have gotten lucky or have been especially prepared in a given line like Niemann claims to have been
smoldesu|3 years ago
This reductive approach to looking at cheating will just end with both of these shmucks sitting naked in an empty room, surrounded by an audience of a single referee who's job is to stop them from physically attacking one another. If he wants to accuse someone of cheating, he should do it - otherwise, dragging someone in public and refusing to make public statements doesn't reflect well on his professional integrity.
bombcar|3 years ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheating_in_bridge
Bridge is an imperfect information game so the opportunities are much larger, but something similar can happen in chess.
MauranKilom|3 years ago
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonlinear_junction_detector
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_(listening_device)
perihelions|3 years ago
- "Such a technique was used in the 1980s construction of the U.S. embassy in Moscow. Thousands of diodes were mixed into the building's structural concrete making detection and removal of the true listening devices nearly impossible."
roflyear|3 years ago
Hans has performed well in tournaments where there was no live broadcast. What's the explanation?