top | item 32994500 (no title) stackola | 3 years ago We aren't even talking about arming anyone, we were talking about sabotage. discuss order hn newest JumpCrisscross|3 years ago > we were talking about sabotageThis is a message, a fuckup or an accident. What it is not is a successful covert operation by a competent intelligence agency. stackola|3 years ago ... is what the intelligence agency would say. load replies (1) aa-jv|3 years ago Biden openly stated that he would destroy these pipelines.Why would a "competent" intelligence agency need to get involved in making it covert, after the US President, himself, admitted that it would happen?This straw man argument you're making does serve to deflect attention from the one party that is obviously going to benefit from this event, however. load replies (1)
JumpCrisscross|3 years ago > we were talking about sabotageThis is a message, a fuckup or an accident. What it is not is a successful covert operation by a competent intelligence agency. stackola|3 years ago ... is what the intelligence agency would say. load replies (1) aa-jv|3 years ago Biden openly stated that he would destroy these pipelines.Why would a "competent" intelligence agency need to get involved in making it covert, after the US President, himself, admitted that it would happen?This straw man argument you're making does serve to deflect attention from the one party that is obviously going to benefit from this event, however. load replies (1)
aa-jv|3 years ago Biden openly stated that he would destroy these pipelines.Why would a "competent" intelligence agency need to get involved in making it covert, after the US President, himself, admitted that it would happen?This straw man argument you're making does serve to deflect attention from the one party that is obviously going to benefit from this event, however. load replies (1)
JumpCrisscross|3 years ago
This is a message, a fuckup or an accident. What it is not is a successful covert operation by a competent intelligence agency.
stackola|3 years ago
aa-jv|3 years ago
Why would a "competent" intelligence agency need to get involved in making it covert, after the US President, himself, admitted that it would happen?
This straw man argument you're making does serve to deflect attention from the one party that is obviously going to benefit from this event, however.