top | item 33000840

(no title)

MartinMond | 3 years ago

Love how we're realizing that .hta was actually incredible. I have fond memories of building my own https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML_Application

discuss

order

jimmygrapes|3 years ago

Quick shout out to the Compiled HTML[0] (.chm) format for similar but unrelated reasons. The Help viewer application was one of the pinnacles of good UX, in my opinion.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Compiled_HTML_Help

mappu|3 years ago

A while back at $DAYJOB I tried to get a CI pipeline to bundle our docs as .chm, but the official tooling (hhc, with-or-without Sphinx as a frontend) is windows-only pre-unicode nonsense; the only Linux native chm compiler i found was Halibut (from the author of PuTTY) which has many of its own idiosyncrasies.

Is there any normal-looking way to make a chm from a directory full of html files?

mmastrac|3 years ago

.hta really had to go through the standardization process to tighten up security. Those things were awesome, but you'd basically be owned immediately.

rnestler|3 years ago

It's kind of impressive that one can still run the same .hta app even on Windows 11 according to the wikipedia article:

> HTAs are dependent on the Trident (MSHTML) browser engine, used by Internet Explorer, but are not dependent on the Internet Explorer application itself. If a user removes Internet Explorer from Windows, via the Control Panel, the MSHTML engine remains and HTAs continue to work. HTAs continue to work in Windows 11 as well.