I hate it when "zero emission vehicles" stands for "electric cars". We have trains, bicycles, and a number of non-car electric vehicles too. We should try to reduce the number of cars on road, not just make them electric.
The market trend seems to confirm the Clean Hydrogen Ladder [1] prediction that Fuel Cell Vehicles are a bad idea.
Quote: "FCVs continue to find it difficult to compete with BEVs on cost
and popularity and are unlikely to gain market share in the
passenger vehicle segment."
I was reading some assesment from the UK Health and Safety executive that in order to meet the same capacity as a typical petrol / diesel station a hydrogen station would need 2 truck deliveries of liquid hydrogen per day, something like 5% of trucks on the road would be employed delivering hydrogen.
Is it only me, or those graphs are resembling S curve which is slowly getting to its plateau, because rich people bought their BEVs and poor can't afford them?
BEVs remain mostly a luxury purchase right now in the west, but the price of the average EV in China has been dropping precipitously (almost 50% in the last 10 years) [1]. Several big US auto manufacturers are also gearing up to break into the ~$20k market in the next few years.
A very interesting point shown here is the extremely large amount of overall energy storage/saving capacity that will be in the EVs themselves and the questions of how to “leverage” that, by bi-directional charging, for example.
What else could be possible here?
Huge grids powered by “undriven” EVs, whilst their owners receive cashback?
> The cumulative storage available from the EV fleet is so large that if
it were all available, it would saturate revenues in the power system.
This means there is likely a limit to the share of vehicles that charge
bi-directionally.
Having too much EV battery capacity available to support grid energy storage seems like a very nice problem to have and should further boost investments in wind and solar. I hope that bidirectional charging ports become a requirement on all high-priced future housing.
Just demand shifting of charging will have a big impact. EVs are a battery and and a computer on wheels. Charging automatically when the grid is cheap and green is going to really help the roll out of renewables.
For somebody not well-versed in EV developments, pg. 13, titled "EVs will have 17 times the battery capacity of stationary storage systems by 2030", made interesting reading.
On a side note, I found many of the graphs difficult to differentiate.
[+] [-] adrianN|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zeristor|3 years ago|reply
I mean if cities were more walkable there'd be less need to join the arms race of more and more aggressive cars on the road.
[+] [-] Rygian|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pelasaco|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Rygian|3 years ago|reply
Quote: "FCVs continue to find it difficult to compete with BEVs on cost and popularity and are unlikely to gain market share in the passenger vehicle segment."
[1] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/clean-hydrogen-ladder-v40-mic...
[+] [-] VBprogrammer|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] TheLoafOfBread|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cantaloupe|3 years ago|reply
[1] https://www.euronews.com/next/amp/2021/09/28/china-s-carmake...
[+] [-] alex_duf|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] toomuchtodo|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tacker2000|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tromp|3 years ago|reply
Having too much EV battery capacity available to support grid energy storage seems like a very nice problem to have and should further boost investments in wind and solar. I hope that bidirectional charging ports become a requirement on all high-priced future housing.
[+] [-] ZeroGravitas|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] roter|3 years ago|reply
On a side note, I found many of the graphs difficult to differentiate.
[+] [-] p0w3n3d|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] codeulike|3 years ago|reply
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-emissions_vehicle
[+] [-] benj111|3 years ago|reply