(no title)
AngusH | 3 years ago
The report showed, under a base case scenario, that margins between peak demand and power supply were expected to be sufficient and similar to recent years thanks to secure North Sea gas supplies, imports via Norway and by ship.
Any operator that didn't have such contingency plans would be negligent.
Is it going to happen in reality: hopefully not
Edit: I have a feeling that the article may be referring to the 3 hour Loss of Load Expectation (LOLE) service level target for the year.
This isn't quite the same as a three hour blackout.
I'm not sure though because the sky article doesn't reference its sources.
Which may be this:
https://www.nationalgrideso.com/document/264521/download
or it might not?
edit2:
actually I think it's this:
https://www.nationalgrideso.com/document/268346/download
edit3:
Found it, its not the LOLE target, but the response to scenario 2 on page 10 of the second link:
scenario 1: "In this scenario we assume that we have no electricity interconnector imports from France, Belgium and the Netherlands (these are assumed to provide a de-rated capacity of 3.9GW in the Base Case). It is assumed that we import 1.2GW from Norway and export 0.4GW to Northern Ireland and Ireland."
scenario 2: "In this scenario we assume the same assumptions as Scenario 1, but with an additional 10GW CCGTs unavailable for a two-week period in January1. These assumptions have been chosen to illustrate the potential impact on the electricity system if there was insufficient gas supply in Great Britain."
"Should this scenario happen, it may be necessary to initiate the planned, controlled and temporary rota load shedding scheme under the Electricity Supply Emergency Code (ESEC). In the unlikely event we were in this situation, it would mean that some customers could be without power for pre-defined periods during a day – generally this is assumed to be for 3 hour blocks. This would be necessary to ensure the overall security and integrity of the electricity system across Great Britain. All possible mitigating strategies would be deployed to minimise the disruption."
Which I think would then follow this set of rules:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/...
final: I think my information here is mostly right. But you should not base your electricity operational decisions on it!
okasaki|3 years ago
Time to go to the local charity shop and buy some wool sweaters.
AngusH|3 years ago
try this one from 20 years ago:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3034088.stm
(it's on this topic of energy)
sefrost|3 years ago
> Sites with a continuous manufacturing process, not sustainable through BEIS standby generation, where regular shutdown for 3-hour periods is not possible and would cause significant financial damage
I wonder if this includes Agile offices, it seems like a broad definition!
AngusH|3 years ago
Very broad indeed, though I think it's just qualification for asking, not grounds for acceptance, (thankfully)
One thing I'm curious to know is what it's like on the distribution side though, getting these requests and then approving them (or not)
I wonder if they only get serious requests (say steel mills and hospitals) or if they also get requests from non-essential businesses who shouldn't be on the list?
Most data centers should have back up power, so the question of whether Facebook, Twitter and Amazon get cut off probably doesn't need to be asked.
tomxor|3 years ago
(Regularly) shutting down such operations could quite realistically bankrupt them.
tialaramex|3 years ago
AngusH|3 years ago
Overall the UK grid is probably too dependent on wind energy, with all the variability that involves.
Right now gridwatch.org.uk is showing about 13.5GW from wind (40% of demand), but I've seen some days when there has been well under 1GW.