IT kind of is true. Sure the death count directly attributable to nuclear reactors is low. But Fukushima caused the entire countries fleet to shut down - to the present day. Safety isn't about lives lost or health, it's about financial repurcussions of the accidents - both directly at the site (take a look at Fukushima today) and the effects on the wider industry, shutting down all the surrounding power plants, and forcing Japan to import fossils to compensate.
samatman|3 years ago
Because journalists and activists spun it into a near-total shutdown of new nuclear production, and for no other reason.
beej71|3 years ago
If new reactors like this one can avoid such outcomes where the old ones cannot, it's a decided improvement.
Manuel_D|3 years ago
By what metric? The exclusion zone has been completely lifted. The amount of radiation released into the ocean is negligible.
ksidudwbw|3 years ago
pydry|3 years ago
The only measure of nuclear safety I trust is the liability cap. Currently in America it stands at 0.04% ($300 million) the cost of 1 Fukushima ($800 billion).
teamonkey|3 years ago
Fast forward to today, where governments are now facing pressure to extend the life of old existing nuclear plants past their shutdown date to reduce dependence on gas.
Manuel_D|3 years ago
No, overreaction to Fukushima caused the shutdowns.
thrown_22|3 years ago
>We need to do something, this is something, egro we must do it.
You can't fix stupid.