(no title)
ryangittins | 3 years ago
It's frustrating when you're forced to change the behavior of your "agnostic" application for the sake of a large, commonly-used third party tool in the ecosystem.
ryangittins | 3 years ago
It's frustrating when you're forced to change the behavior of your "agnostic" application for the sake of a large, commonly-used third party tool in the ecosystem.
coder543|3 years ago
If an HTTP server is ignoring the Accept-Encoding header and choosing to serve a Content-Encoding that the client can't accept, that is the problem here. If the server and client can't come to an agreement, isn't that the purpose of HTTP 406? But, being able to serve both gzip'd and plain text versions of an XML file doesn't seem that crazy.
ryangittins|3 years ago