(no title)
stvswn | 3 years ago
The program was really a bailout so businesses could maintain their payrolls when everything was shutdown. Instead of writing the checks directly, the government decided to frame it as a loan that would be forgiven if businesses stayed in business and spent it on their payrolls. This was a good strategy for the government, because it would have been pretty tough to enforce otherwise.
So the loan forgiveness was by _design_ and the point of the program was to keep businesses alive when the governments themselves were (for perhaps good reason) making it impossible for them to operate. It's not really "forgiveness" in the sense of, say, the college loan forgiveness program.
caseysoftware|3 years ago
I think this is a key point.
The PPP "loans" effectively became a payout to mitigate the chance & success of businesses suing the government en mass for the shutdown orders.
When you sue an entity civilly, you have to show damages. The PPP "loans" countered those damages (and often more) which means the threshold for a successful lawsuit just got WAY higher.
brightball|3 years ago
You kept people employed and on their employers insurance, benefits, etc. You let businesses try to remain as operational as possible during the shut down.
The alternative was going to be mass layoffs, unemployment and medicaid/aca applications.
The people who keep harping on PPP seem to forget everything else that was done in the same time period.
nrmitchi|3 years ago
tastyfreeze|3 years ago