(no title)
phpthrowaway99 | 3 years ago
Low performers were fired because they answered incoming calls poorly twice in a week.
So it IS possible top performers were allowed to have side gigs and not fired at Equifax.
phpthrowaway99 | 3 years ago
Low performers were fired because they answered incoming calls poorly twice in a week.
So it IS possible top performers were allowed to have side gigs and not fired at Equifax.
lostcolony|3 years ago
This is an excuse. But, interestingly, it was an excuse for 2% of the people they investigated.
So apparently being a poor performer at Equifax, but NOT moonlighting, is not a fireable offense, since the other 98% weren't let go. Or they were, and this is just a propaganda piece in service to corporations (it is Business Insider after all). Either way, I feel, not exactly a great look for Equifax (like they have ever looked good), since either way it's still a waste of man hours spent to justify firing people they wanted to fire anyway.
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]