[uhuruity]

Logseq's own sync is now in testing and you can access it if you're a sponsor ($15/month tier). I became one just to try it out. It works fine but has enough bugs that I wouldn't rely on it yet - but they are responsive to fixing the bugs that we report.

Just saying this to let you know that their sync is reasonably far along in development and one option would be to wait it out.

[solarkraft]

> $15/month tier

Oh my. I've been considering trying it out, but I'm not that high.

Sync via Syncthing has problems with conflict resolution, unfortunately (but I think these could be reasonably easily resolved).

[selykg]

These tools are struggling it seems to make money and are forcing some super high prices for syncing. Obsidians sync price is nutty. $15/mo for logseq is equally nutty.

I would really urge these companies to try to find a better way. You can’t bend your users over that want seamless sync. Take a little from a larger user base so you aren’t charging so damn much for sync. It’s ridiculous.

Charge $12 a year for some common features as a base package. If users want to go higher up add sync at a reasonable price and give them the same features plus sync.

Sync pricing shouldn’t subsidize free users, at least in my opinion.

[greymalik]

Try syncing via git: https://github.com/CharlesChiuGit/Logseq-Git-Sync-101

[ekianjo]

why not use syncthing?