[paulosman]

Added a clarification: first non-founder/executive employee to sit on a board. If there's another venture-backed software company in North America who's put a rank and file employee on their board, I'd love to hear about it!

[eatonphil]

That's a pretty massive statement to make that is almost impossible to prove correct and needs only one counterexample to be proven incorrect (which has already been provided in this thread).

[ihm]

I mentioned in another comment but at O(1) Labs (which is VC-backed) we've had a board composed of employees for about a year. I'm not sure about the timing of your situation, but also I'm sure we're not the first company to do so.

[ska]

This is probably worth an application of a much more general principle: if you have experienced something directly it's quite likely to be fairly common, however if you haven't experienced something it's not good evidence that it isn't fairly common.

Path dependence means personal experience is rarely very generalizable.

Of course if you've made a systematic study of corporate governance and have data on thousands of companies, things are different.

[aerosmile]

Your reasoning in this discussion is unbecoming of a board member. In your activity on that board you’re involved in a lot of open-ended conversations with a lot of ambiguity and high cost of failure. I hope you express yourself in that setting with a bit more humility and introspection.

[paulosman]

I find your tone dismissive, condescending and snarky. I made a (hedged) statement that turned out to be incorrect, updated the blog post, and moved on. I didn't think it was a statement of great consequence, certainly nothing to fixate on.

Please review the HN Guidelines and ask yourself if posting your comment added to or detracted from the value of this discussion:

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

[xapata]

Why do you think you're the first? Did you perform a systematic survey?