[MathYouF]

> Numeracy is just as valuable as literacy.

I actually think this is likely not true.

If you were to take an 18 year old who can't read, and another one who can't do addition, which do you think is less employable?

There's a lot of jobs one can do without any math. Almost none one can do without any reading.

There's more to it than all this of course, but I think literacy is the clear winner compared to numeracy.

[shafoshaf]

Just living life requires basic algebraic skills. Loans, insurance, taxes, and virtually any kind of projection into the future require concepts like X = 2Y. Understanding that something is linear or exponential is critical to and to understand when one is better than the other requires that someone learn how we as society express those concepts, which is algebra.

The person who can't read can be a traffic guard, server (with the right cash register), bricklayer, or any of a number of jobs. However, all of those people need to know that they worked X hours @ $15/hour and should be paid 15X. Otherwise they will never know if they were ripped off or be able to plan for the future.

[jelkand]

I have a suspicion that we both agree that both numeracy and literacy are very important, and picking the winner doesn't change a lot.

That said, addition is a very low bar--I cannot think of a single job that would not require at least basic addition.