top | item 33248322

(no title)

RichardCNormos | 3 years ago

discuss

order

kasey_junk|3 years ago

Are you suggesting that an American city could socialize a large chunk of its private real estate with the stroke of a pen or that landlords are waiting for some legal change to turn their office/retail space into homeless shelters and needle exchanges?

bdw5204|3 years ago

The 5th Amendment of the US Constitution specifically permits eminent domain with "just compensation" so yes an American city could take a large chunk of its private real estate under eminent domain and put it to "public use". Converting vacant office buildings into homeless shelters would absolutely count as a "public use".

whimsicalism|3 years ago

Boston has done it, I worked with an affordable housing group that worked on this stuff. The difference was these were largely undeveloped lots, not office buildings.

kjkjadksj|3 years ago

Why not? Theyve laid waste to hundreds of thousands of homes to build freeways with a stroke of a pen before.

AdrianB1|3 years ago

I'm not sure if that was sarcasm (especially the part with needle exchange), but it is San Francisco so yes, it could.

blululu|3 years ago

No. The problem is deeper than that. Adding more housing and more services will help but don't kid yourself into thinking that these things are free or that they will magically make the problems disappear. People will still be on drugs. People will still have mental health problems. People will still commit crimes. The amount of work required is bigger than any writing implement can accomplish.

dilap|3 years ago

With just a little initiative, the whole city could be like the TL.

marcinzm|3 years ago

You mean the stroke of a pen and a massive amount of money (to buy the buildings, convert them to the legal standards for such spaces, manage the buildings, manage the programs, etc, etc.).

refurb|3 years ago

Induced demand just like roads.

gedy|3 years ago

While well intentioned, this would tank commercial and residential occupancy further, and SF is a uniquely bad location for that approach.

ztrww|3 years ago

Nope. after this even more people would move into SF increasing the homeless population and the demand for low income housing. Or do you actually believe that the majority of homeless people in SF grew up there?

ciguy|3 years ago

Wow what a great original idea. Let's just turn the whole city into an unlivable hellscape like the Tenderloin!

fdgsdfogijq|3 years ago

Sounds like a dream for a drug addict. Do heroin all day, get clean needles, breakfast and a place to sleep