Is there any way to download the highest quality audio track (format 141) in yt-dlp without using my cookies from my YT premium account? If that's possible then I'll consider dropping my subscription
Ad blockers work for me on youtube, though with hiccups. I figure that when that stops working I’ll use youtube less, it’s already a time sink. And will also dust off torrent clients.
Thankfully this new price hike seems to be only for family plans, and I can still keep my $7.99 grandfathered individual plan. Though the day that gets increased I'm jumping ship to something else.
I will never pay for YouTube until I'm guaranteed a way to opt out of the recommendation algorithm. It's not so much a recommendation algorithm as much as it is an adversarial search on my behavior to see what cheap content I'll actually engage. Every so often I'll notice a video from a clickbait-ey channel in my sidebar about a topic I care little for, like expensive luxury items or epic pop star moments.
So, I can't trust YouTube to be objective in its recommendations. It's very likely attempting to train me to seek deeper pools within their content graph so that I use YouTube more. Which is fine if it were a free model ("freemium", really), as I would implicitly agree to be mined in exchange for a hosted service with plenty of content. That I would PAY for that, however, is not something I would feel happy about. It would feel like paying for the privilege of receiving a slap in the face.
No? It should be a 30% raise for them (for the YT Premium family plan slice of viewers). As long as the revenue split percentage stays constant, an x% increase in the total cost will obviously translate to the same x% increase for each split.
YouTube is a constant strain for Google and its been that way for the past few years. YouTube itself is very expensive to maintain (https://www.theverge.com/2020/2/3/21121207/youtube-google-al...) and has had times when they operated at a loss. Alphabet has blamed YouTube repeatedly for years when they make losses in revenue. Feels like someone crunched up some numbers recently and got angry at what they saw. Almost like this time around someone set a strict revenue goal and are determined to find more ways to profit off YouTube.
If you were ethically inclined toward such things, I've read posts online of people using VPNs to sign up for Youtube Premium from Argentina to pay a reduced rate.
I can't vouch for the effectiveness, but googling does show some people report having tried it successfully.
I share my US family plan with friends in the UK. Their account would be banned occasionally. So, Google is probably aware of this hack, it's just they are not enforcing it too seriously.
EDIT: they only banned the added family member, not the account owner. My workaround is to just recreate family member account.
So I’m going to slow down my gigabit symmetric internet and route my traffic through a third party to hypothetically save $5.00/month? Wouldn’t the VPN be more expensive?
[+] [-] thot_experiment|3 years ago|reply
[0] https://ublockorigin.com/
[1] https://sponsor.ajay.app/
[2] https://newpipe.net/
[3] https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp
[+] [-] sphars|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] beauzero|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tartoran|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] janef0421|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] stokehacker|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] low_tech_punk|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] berkeleyjunk|3 years ago|reply
"Thank you for being a loyal member throughout our journey. "
[+] [-] coldtea|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sphars|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nano9|3 years ago|reply
So, I can't trust YouTube to be objective in its recommendations. It's very likely attempting to train me to seek deeper pools within their content graph so that I use YouTube more. Which is fine if it were a free model ("freemium", really), as I would implicitly agree to be mined in exchange for a hosted service with plenty of content. That I would PAY for that, however, is not something I would feel happy about. It would feel like paying for the privilege of receiving a slap in the face.
[+] [-] togs|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jsnell|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] r3a1d33p|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ViceCitySage|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tiernano|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] slipheen|3 years ago|reply
I can't vouch for the effectiveness, but googling does show some people report having tried it successfully.
[+] [-] r3a1d33p|3 years ago|reply
EDIT: they only banned the added family member, not the account owner. My workaround is to just recreate family member account.
[+] [-] scarface74|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] digianarchist|3 years ago|reply