[throwawayacc2]

Yeah but those weren’t really “refugees” were they? You can’t call your self a refugee if you cross who knows how many borders from Syria and Afghanistan all the way to Sweden. And then add insult to injury by vacationing in the countries they are “fleeing” from.

Sweden wasn’t “the lone member state that did the right thing” and the illegal immigrants were not “dumped on Sweden”. Sweden made a very bad choice opening up to what is very clearly a criminal cohort going out of its way to abuse welfare.

And the same goes for Germany. Even more so because their incompetent leadership invited the entire middle east to Europe.

If you really wanted to “help out” and “be humanitarian” Sweden and the rest of the EU should have established safe zones in Africa. And end what is essentially a ferry service from Africa to Europe. Migrants go on dingy inflatable boats 5 miles of the coast, issue an SOS and get transported to the EU. If this isn’t incentivising illegal migration, I don’t know what is.

You can’t expect to conduct a policy of ethnic replacement which is what Swedens policy has been for the last few decades and don’t get resentment from the native population. You reap what you sow. The only good news is, the tide is turning.

[ashwagary]

>And the same goes for Germany. Even more so because their incompetent leadership invited the entire middle east to Europe.

>If you really wanted to “help out” and “be humanitarian” Sweden and the rest of the EU should have established safe zones in Africa.

The solution is to stress African countries instead of the European ones that helped create the Syrian refugees in the first place?