(no title)
yarky | 3 years ago
Which can be trapped/filtered to avoid pollution.
> if plastics ever become sufficiently valuable - or recycling sufficiently viable.
If that was remotely probable, you'd have banks offering plastic-storage related ETFs already.
yboris|3 years ago
We need good incentives with a system that self-corrects; we need to stop playing whack-a-mole with easily-known-ahead-of-time problems and implement good systems.
smileysteve|3 years ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_gasification
bm-rf|3 years ago
mschuster91|3 years ago
Yes, it's better than burning it outright in open fire pits (as it's done in an awful lot of "third world" countries to concentrate metals out of the waste), but it's way worse than a dump yard. And most of the places that have a lot of plastics waste don't have the resources to install decent scrubbers, much less perfect scrubbers.
[1] https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/06/recycling-global-stat...
jcynix|3 years ago
Yes and no. If the energy is recycled (for heating buildings and/or water) you'll reduce carbon emissions from coal/gas/oil. Waste incineration (instead of landfills) is a thing in various European countries and the heat can (and will) be used to heat buildings or the steam drives turbines to generate electricity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incineration