I am genuinely curious: why did the FTC take this enforcement action?
There is no fine, no prosecution, no consequences of any sort. Essentially, they're just asking the executive to "implement an information security program" at any companies they head.
This seems to send the message that there are absolutely no consequences for getting caught hiding an extremely negligent data breach. Was that the FTC's intent?
> Recognizing that reality, the Commission’s proposed order will follow Rellas even if he leaves Drizly. Specifically, Rellas will be required to implement an information security program at future companies if he moves to a business collecting consumer information
I'm not aware of any other decree following the CEO to other companies.
How does Drizly change that? I've had to show ID to prove age for the few Drizly orders I've made (even if there wasn't alcohol in the delivery). If the teenager already has a fake ID, how does Drizly move the meter on how easy it is to get alcohol?
[+] [-] ferrocarraiges|3 years ago|reply
There is no fine, no prosecution, no consequences of any sort. Essentially, they're just asking the executive to "implement an information security program" at any companies they head.
This seems to send the message that there are absolutely no consequences for getting caught hiding an extremely negligent data breach. Was that the FTC's intent?
[+] [-] kingkilr|3 years ago|reply
The FTC can seek monetary relief if this order is violated.
[+] [-] jnorthrop|3 years ago|reply
> Recognizing that reality, the Commission’s proposed order will follow Rellas even if he leaves Drizly. Specifically, Rellas will be required to implement an information security program at future companies if he moves to a business collecting consumer information
I'm not aware of any other decree following the CEO to other companies.
[+] [-] adrr|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] neogodless|3 years ago|reply
That seems less than ideal.
[+] [-] lancesells|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hayst4ck|3 years ago|reply
You would need a way to collect breaches by company, and then a way to tie companies to their URLs. Additionally, is solarwinds a Microsoft breach?
If there were a repository of known security breaches, I think the rest could be done manually or fairly easily for a specific list of websites.
[+] [-] unknown|3 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] kwerk|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] raunak|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fragmede|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] monksy|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Karunamon|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] s3r3nity|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|3 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] unstatusthequo|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] monksy|3 years ago|reply