[crankin]

@layer8 one thing to keep in mind is your future and past self are people you can delegate to. If today I prepare a tuna sandwich in a brown paper sac for tomorrow's lunch. Then I have delegated that decision to "someone else"... past me. Keeping my current self focused in the now.

Yesterday me's focus was on making the sandwich.

But here's another piece of advice. Don't think in absolutes! Sometimes you'll have to use your gut on a Type 1, sometimes you'll be making the Type 2 decision. It's just advice not the law of Moses.

[layer8]

I was mostly referring to “delegate to smart people”. My today’s self preparing a tuna sandwich for tomorrow probably isn’t smarter than my tomorrow’s self eating the sandwich ;). So, the “low priority” = “delegate to smart people” doesn’t make sense to me, and I suspect is not what you meant. If anything, I would want to delegate the “scientific method” stuff to people smarter than me.

[crankin]

These terms are relative. Low priority doesn't mean not important or even not difficult. As an executive I delegate parts of the scientific method to my team when analyzing Type 1 decisions however the final go/no-go decision is squarely on me and I have to answer to my share holders and my employees if I get it wrong. You should never ever delegate blame.

Type 2 simply means low consequence, again relative. Because everyones appetite for consequence is different. For example a Type 2 decision for me is Health Care. I delegate to my spouse to pick the plan. If a bad decision is made worse case is my out of pocket is higher than I would like but it can be remedied in 12 months. It's an important decision and difficult one but for me personally it's a Type 2. For someone else that might be a Type 1 and they must really pick the right plan.

So apply the advise to your life in the way that makes the most sense. And for me personally what I eat for lunch is always a Type 1 ;)