(no title)
Grim-444 | 3 years ago
And yet, this is an article that how many thousands of people will read, and internalize into their model of reality? How much more hate will such an article foster?
Shouldn't we at least require some SHRED of proof for articles such as these?
memish|3 years ago
Ligma and Johnson ("They are visibly shaken"), mass layoffs before Nov 1st (nope), unbanned accounts would be back on by Monday (nope), Elon restored Ye's account (it was restored before the acquisition), Saudi Arabia bought into Twitter (they already were shareholders), etc...
systemvoltage|3 years ago
https://twitter.com/austen/status/1587458237414068224
My generous take on this: Media is incompetent and they need to do more due diligence.
My cynical take on this: Media is losing its power and influence, this is the last ditch effort to smear opponents.
lemmsjid|3 years ago
If that kind of reporting is below the bar for evidence, then a lot of abuses will never see the light of day.
legitster|3 years ago
He'll say random flippant things in meetings he know will get leaked. Those things don't happen. He trains his employees not to trust the news and gets to make a point about news trying to find an axe to grind.
galaxyLogic|3 years ago
badwolf|3 years ago
johnchristopher|3 years ago
/s