top | item 3344765 Sproutcore 2.0 renamed to Ember.js - GitHub 62 points| jollyjerry | 14 years ago |github.com | reply 21 comments order hn newest [+] [-] czheng|14 years ago|reply Confused this with ender for a second... (http://ender.no.de/) [+] [-] nbashaw|14 years ago|reply So Sproutcore 2.0 split into two camps, Ember.js and Amber.js? Someone correct me if I'm wrong, this is confusing. [+] [-] ibdknox|14 years ago|reply Instead of going with "amber.js" they went with "ember.js"sproutcore 2.0 = amber.js = ember.jsThey're all the same with the final one being the official new name. load replies (2) [+] [-] murz|14 years ago|reply Kind of odd, it was announced as "Amber.js":http://yehudakatz.com/2011/12/08/announcing-amber-js/ [+] [-] dwynings|14 years ago|reply http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3335916 load replies (1) [+] [-] untog|14 years ago|reply I'm wondering if there was some kind of copyright/trademark issue at play here. load replies (2) [+] [-] unknown|14 years ago|reply [deleted] [+] [-] curiouskat|14 years ago|reply amber.js had a nice feel to it -- ember.js, not so much. [+] [-] jrockway|14 years ago|reply What's in a name? load replies (1) [+] [-] Zolomon|14 years ago|reply I like ember.js - makes me think of flames!! load replies (1) [+] [-] steele|14 years ago|reply Now I have to return my amber lamps.
[+] [-] nbashaw|14 years ago|reply So Sproutcore 2.0 split into two camps, Ember.js and Amber.js? Someone correct me if I'm wrong, this is confusing. [+] [-] ibdknox|14 years ago|reply Instead of going with "amber.js" they went with "ember.js"sproutcore 2.0 = amber.js = ember.jsThey're all the same with the final one being the official new name. load replies (2)
[+] [-] ibdknox|14 years ago|reply Instead of going with "amber.js" they went with "ember.js"sproutcore 2.0 = amber.js = ember.jsThey're all the same with the final one being the official new name. load replies (2)
[+] [-] murz|14 years ago|reply Kind of odd, it was announced as "Amber.js":http://yehudakatz.com/2011/12/08/announcing-amber-js/ [+] [-] dwynings|14 years ago|reply http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3335916 load replies (1) [+] [-] untog|14 years ago|reply I'm wondering if there was some kind of copyright/trademark issue at play here. load replies (2)
[+] [-] untog|14 years ago|reply I'm wondering if there was some kind of copyright/trademark issue at play here. load replies (2)
[+] [-] curiouskat|14 years ago|reply amber.js had a nice feel to it -- ember.js, not so much. [+] [-] jrockway|14 years ago|reply What's in a name? load replies (1) [+] [-] Zolomon|14 years ago|reply I like ember.js - makes me think of flames!! load replies (1)
[+] [-] czheng|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nbashaw|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ibdknox|14 years ago|reply
sproutcore 2.0 = amber.js = ember.js
They're all the same with the final one being the official new name.
[+] [-] murz|14 years ago|reply
http://yehudakatz.com/2011/12/08/announcing-amber-js/
[+] [-] dwynings|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] untog|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|14 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] curiouskat|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jrockway|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Zolomon|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] steele|14 years ago|reply