This is alright, I like the category breakdown, it makes browsing great, but its still subject to what _youtube_ considers good content. Which just results in the top content being short-form videos which provide quick-facts, not something I can actually learn with. Not necessarily a bad thing for different categories or if that is what you're seeking in the category but a consequential factor for someone seeking something outside the advertiser-friendly, profit maximizing algorithms.
I just love things the variety of things that fall outside the google-ads algos its so easy to silo our "content" from platforms like this. I browse marginalia [0] just to spice it up and see what else there is out there.
>Which just results in the top content being short-form videos which provide quick-facts, not something I can actually learn with.
Youtube also has tons of long-form 1+ hours content. There's a recent machine learning video that's 25+ hours long and it's not hidden away in obscurity. It's prominently listed on the 1st page of search results for "deep learning tutorial" : https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=deep+learning+t...
As another example, I got a friend exposed to sewing channels on Youtube. Some content creators create hour-long "sew alongs" which she watches every week now to learn new techniques. It fills in a gap left behind by Public Television since they don't air sewing shows anymore.
Lots of long-form videos in car repairs, woodworking, etc.
Try digging deeper into the "Related Keywords" cloud at the top, the narrower is the keyword you pick, the more long-form & technical and the less pop-channell-y stuff you'll see.
I think this list shows that how overwhelming the amount of resources to learn but we have so limited time. I think Duolingo style learning paths are way to go because we need to minimize the time to learn something. These kind of dumps are of no use except for bookmarking and feeling good.
I had the opposite reaction. I think this list shows what is passable as educational nowadays. I would personally be very cautious to consider anything included as edutainment, never mind educational.
I took some time to peruse the list after topics for which I took formal education and could not find a single useful channel.
The only very few exceptions to the rule are MIT OCW kind of channels where universities include playlists with footage of undergraduate courses.
This is exactly how I wish YouTube allowed me to browse for videos! Great resource. Does anyone on HN have additional resources that allow for content discovery?
I'm creating an encyclopedia based on Wikipedia, Wikidata, YouTube and many other sources of information. For each of the millions of topics in a language-wiki, the software renders a "topic card" with thematic sections, each containing links to other content. Link: https://conze.pt
This is actually pretty awesome! I think the ranking algo is doing a pretty good job. I checked a few categories I follow closely, and the top results match pretty well with how I would personally rank them. And now I'm off to explore other topics. Thanks!
Idea is great but there is a lot of overlap between the tags, e.g. there are six pages of tags for Chinese but half of them are all variants on the same tech topics (e.g. there is a separate tag for 苹果、手机、电脑、and "apple watch").
Unfortunately all the other languages have too few results, I just checked and Greek only has 0.7% as many channels as English in the db, so it'd only be a few pages of content
Amazing headline. It reminds me about a joke from a Futurama episode, from the late 90s, while Fry is channel surfing intergalactic cable, "Sheesh... 40,000 channels and only 150 of them have anything good on."
If 10,000 people say this but there is little overlap in the channel preferences, suddenly 40,000 channels seems a reasonable number. Point being that there are a wide ranging number of interests, just because it isn't in your niche, doesn't mean it shouldn't be there at all.
This is pretty awesome. One small feedback, I noticed how there are multiple tags indicating same kind of content. for ex - "Mathematics" and "math". Combining these would be useful.
I'll add a report button, it definitely needs it. All of that data is from the the youtube channels themselves and _a lot_ of them mislabel things, even such basic ones as their channel's language.
I had to split it because the sheer size of Indian audiences breaks all the metrics, and yet those videos would not be super relevant in the west as a very large percentage of the Indian educational youtube consists of various kinds of local exam/test preparation channels
IIRC Indian English has almost 250m speakers, which is in the same ballpark as what we'd call American English and has its own, distinct features as much as AmE vs. BrE.
Looks cool! curious how you sourced and tagged the channels?
We have a few popular anatomy channels in different languages[0], but I couldn’t find any of our videos when searching for “anatomy” and also results were quite mixed. Some videos were quite unrelated or very loosely related at best.
This is a great resource. One thing to watch out for if you're using this to practice listening skills in a foreign language, is that not all regions seem to be tagged correctly. I clicked on Spanish, then the Mexico tag, and the top video was of someone with a Spanish accent rather than a Mexican or Latin American one.
Yeah, that is something I'd love to implement but so far could not figure it out, even simply interlinking the keywords across 20 different languages is very non-trivial
AI has already digitized these videos a countless number of times why are we slow to implement this as an algorithm into the genetic code of a fish which we may then stick into our ear to perform any spoken translation to us.
We will probably have similar for eyeballs one day but they may be more invasive.
Because it's a "list"? I don't think that's correct, there's ballpark 200k different pages with unique content in that app, that's a lot more than just a list.
The Chinese version distinguishes simplified from traditional characters. It shouldn’t do that.
The German version is a little meh. Top categories are something like “howto”. It seems like you used a very simple word-based algorithm to create the categories?
This is missing something critical: It shows tags, but does not allow to use them like tags. Instead it only allows to use them as categories. One should be able to narrow down results by clicking multiple tags.
I did think about it, but my concern was that because I only take a small subset of top keywords for each channel, it's very easy to create a combination of tags that'll show no results. I'll play around with it and see if it makes sense to implement.
>anyone is hiring and someone says they did UX at YT - do not hire them.
Unless you and your business care more about monies than what people say on social media, and your company is suddenly making more money then... I guess hire them?
adhoc_slime|3 years ago
I just love things the variety of things that fall outside the google-ads algos its so easy to silo our "content" from platforms like this. I browse marginalia [0] just to spice it up and see what else there is out there.
[0] https://search.marginalia.nu/
jasode|3 years ago
Youtube also has tons of long-form 1+ hours content. There's a recent machine learning video that's 25+ hours long and it's not hidden away in obscurity. It's prominently listed on the 1st page of search results for "deep learning tutorial" : https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=deep+learning+t...
As another example, I got a friend exposed to sewing channels on Youtube. Some content creators create hour-long "sew alongs" which she watches every week now to learn new techniques. It fills in a gap left behind by Public Television since they don't air sewing shows anymore.
Lots of long-form videos in car repairs, woodworking, etc.
EDIT ADD: the 25-hour deep learning video example is this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_ikDlimN6A
... which was also copied to freeCodeCamp.org channel (the 12th recently uploaded video) :
https://www.youtube.com/c/Freecodecamp/videos
askytb|3 years ago
kosmet|3 years ago
vitorsr|3 years ago
I took some time to peruse the list after topics for which I took formal education and could not find a single useful channel.
The only very few exceptions to the rule are MIT OCW kind of channels where universities include playlists with footage of undergraduate courses.
frozencell|3 years ago
proee|3 years ago
nileshtrivedi|3 years ago
conzept|3 years ago
yuy910616|3 years ago
elil17|3 years ago
spapas82|3 years ago
askytb|3 years ago
elkos|3 years ago
trts|3 years ago
mym1990|3 years ago
rajeshp1986|3 years ago
ElijahLynn|3 years ago
Not sure how to report an incorrect listing on your site, would be good to better surface how to do that.
askytb|3 years ago
nanook|3 years ago
askytb|3 years ago
rpastuszak|3 years ago
IIRC Indian English has almost 250m speakers, which is in the same ballpark as what we'd call American English and has its own, distinct features as much as AmE vs. BrE.
Edit: added context
gingerlime|3 years ago
We have a few popular anatomy channels in different languages[0], but I couldn’t find any of our videos when searching for “anatomy” and also results were quite mixed. Some videos were quite unrelated or very loosely related at best.
[0] main one in English https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHn_K1zOBYZqtmIYkXLEIQw
askytb|3 years ago
And on the second page for the anatomy keyword https://limnology.co/en/languages/en/keywords/anatomy?page=2
I think it got somewhat downranked because of the recent views/subscribers mismatch
fudged71|3 years ago
enumjorge|3 years ago
spaniard89277|3 years ago
It would be cool to be able to find similar channels in other languages, but I can see how that would be challenging.
askytb|3 years ago
shirononon_|3 years ago
We will probably have similar for eyeballs one day but they may be more invasive.
dang|3 years ago
askytb|3 years ago
phyrex|3 years ago
The German version is a little meh. Top categories are something like “howto”. It seems like you used a very simple word-based algorithm to create the categories?
zelphirkalt|3 years ago
askytb|3 years ago
photochemsyn|3 years ago
One suggestion is to include video length in the individual video display, as most of the very short videos aren't that useful.
worik|3 years ago
It should be the St. George's cross, or at the very least (and most practically) the Union Jack.
bigyikes|3 years ago
…but then it might be replaced by an Indian or Nigerian flag in a few decades :)
penguin_booze|3 years ago
beefman|3 years ago
repple|3 years ago
elcapitan|3 years ago
- search box on every sub page
- allow for reverse search of channels I know (so I can check out similar channels)
askytb|3 years ago
truly|3 years ago
What source are you getting the channels from?
And how do you choose which channel goes in?
okdood64|3 years ago
tkk23|3 years ago
patrickdavey|3 years ago
visarga|3 years ago
allarm|3 years ago
orsenthil|3 years ago
znpy|3 years ago
throw_m239339|3 years ago
blinding-streak|3 years ago
samstave|3 years ago
If anyone is hiring and someone says they did UX at YT - do not hire them.
agilob|3 years ago
Unless you and your business care more about monies than what people say on social media, and your company is suddenly making more money then... I guess hire them?
johndfsgdgdfg|3 years ago
grammers|3 years ago
sangupta|3 years ago
robot|3 years ago
derekja|3 years ago
ppjim|3 years ago
punnerud|3 years ago
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]
fazfq|3 years ago