top | item 33479525

(no title)

alex23478 | 3 years ago

Just to make sure I didn't miss anything: They're not paying anyone for their fact-checking?

discuss

order

drstewart|3 years ago

They're paying the same amount you got paid for creating free content for YCombinator

melbourne_mat|3 years ago

How to save some cash: 1. Fire your staff, 2. outsource their work to the general public. Brilliant!

But seriously folks: Twitter is rubbish. Find something more useful to do with your time.

vntok|3 years ago

> How to save some cash: 1. Fire your staff, 2. outsource their work to the general public. Brilliant!

What are you talking about? This program has existed at Twitter for years.

pessimizer|3 years ago

> How to save some cash: 1. Fire your staff, 2. outsource their work to the general public. Brilliant!

Imagine this as a sarcastic comment about why a country shouldn't move from a monarchy to a republic.

fazfq|3 years ago

Isn't putting whatever you want next to a popular guy's tweets enough payment?

neura|3 years ago

I mean... they don't pay anybody for it, or actually have any sort of fact-checking right now... and they're still one of the most dominant cessp... err, social media sites.

veidr|3 years ago

This particular technology initiative does appear to be an effort to build a system that harnesses unpaid volunteers as fact-checkers.

However, according to today's front-page Washington Post[1] article, they are also still paying people in the "Trust & Safety" department, to do jobs including fact-checking (and presumably acting on fact-checking done by other humans, and possibly trained-model automated fact-checkers as well).

From what I can understand, the company was recently purchased by an oligarch, who then implemented massive staff cuts of around 50% generally across the board, but the "Trust & Safety" department had a lower level of layoffs, at around 15%. So human staff is apparently still involved in fact-checking, aside from the system described here.

It seems likely that fact-checking on a global "social media" network would necessarily involve various approaches and multiple layers to be effective, so the core idea of this system seems worth trying.

However, it is a difficult problem, with powerful financial and political incentives for various parties to game such a system, it will be interesting to see if this ever yields results, and if so, what those results are.

[1]: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/11/05/twitter...

beachy|3 years ago

Elon is not an Oligarch, unless the US is an Oligarchy (it's not).

> An oligarch is one of the select few people who rule or influence leaders in an oligarchy—a government in which power is held by a select few individuals or a small class of powerful people.