(no title)
orpheansodality | 3 years ago
* SF: 784
* San Jose: 106
Still high numbers IMO but SF for example has ~800k residents, so this only represents ~0.1% of the total population. Not super convinced yet that it's going to have any immediate impact on housing in the city unless this triggers a much larger avalanche of firings that don't have an associated swarm of smaller companies waiting in the wings to pick good employees up at a discount.
[0] https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Here-s-how-many-...
bombcar|3 years ago
It's not exact, but small changes can have large effects.
However SF likely has a huge waiting list of people who would like to move in, so it's not likely to take effect immediately.
type-r|3 years ago
Unlikely -- take a look at the average rent trends. It hasn't recovered to even pre-pandemic levels. https://www.zumper.com/rent-research/san-francisco-ca
rco8786|3 years ago
It's not "Twitter layoffs cause issues" - it's more that if you can identify 5, 10, 15+ well known companies doing layoffs concentrated in that area there is probably also a very long tail of smaller companies doing layoffs also. Cumulative effect of it all can be quite large.
> ~40% of the workforce
This is an enormous exaggeration. However, even a 4-5% reduction in jobs in the area can have an enormous effect on the economy and housing market.
dekervin|3 years ago
andrejc|3 years ago
orpheansodality|3 years ago
784 / 815,201 = 0.00096 = 0.1%