(no title)
ebjaas_2022 | 3 years ago
There's a catch in it as well, which is that you cannot really identify a genius up-front. A genius is, by definition, someone who thinks differently. A lot of people think differently. But the thing with the genius is that he thinks differently and correctly. The latter part won't be obvious until after the fact.
When Alex Ferguson started out as a Manchester United manager he probably already was a genius, but it wasn't obvious until many years later.
Same with Sergey Brin and Larry Page. They probably had a genius vision for the company right from the start. But it's only in retrospect that we recognize that it was, in fact, a genius vision.
Finding a genius is, I think, almost by definition, impossible.
toyg|3 years ago
He was just a good man-manager in what is a sea of managerial mediocrity - football management is largely restricted to ex-pro-footballers who can't do anything else. Rinus Michels was a genius, Arrigo Sacchi was a genius - they actually advanced the sport.
FabHK|3 years ago
It's an interesting counterfactual: without Page, when would Page Rank have come around? The idea that the stationary distribution of a Markov Chain (under certain conditions) is given by the eigenvector to the (largest) eigenvalue 1 is certainly decades old, if not a century.
jll29|3 years ago
That seems inconsistent with reports that they tried to sell early to Yahoo! for $2m.