(no title)
lunaru | 3 years ago
Also, this number is year over year, so the decrease just means the price increases between Oct 21 and Oct 22 are not as steep as between Sept 21 to Sept 22, which is not hard to achieve because Sept 21 to Oct 21 had a bigger month over month jump.
The right way to interpret this number is that high prices have plateaued a bit. Yes that means your groceries are going to be x% higher than in 2020. Short of deflation, they always will be.
matwood|3 years ago
This will inevitably lead to people saying the numbers are fake because milk used to be $2/gallon.
throw0101a|3 years ago
Conversely, if there was a one-time jump in a particular item, it will take a year before it gets 'removed' from the inflation numbers.
Extremely contrived example: if gas/petrol was $1/L in December 2021 (and generally in all of 2021), but $1.20/L in January 2022, then there will be a 20% YoY jump in inflation for the January number comparing Jan 2021 to Jan 2022.
Now if gas stays at $1.20/L in February 2022, it will still register as 20% YoY even though the price has not changed month-to-month. That 20% (YoY) is "stuck" in the system until January 2023 when we're comparing $1.20/L to $1.20/L.
A one-time jump can 'skew' the numbers if all you look at is YoY metrics.
bitshiftfaced|3 years ago
Rather than modeling it as "the price increases happened in a short period of time and then went back to normal," I think it's more likely that it happened more spread out and persistently, and perhaps still is going on. It's not going to jump to zero after some given month
fleddr|3 years ago
Your explanation is fully technically correct, but the subsequent messaging that inflation is zero is a matter of not reading the room.
When an important item dramatically rises in price, this can have a massive impact on people. A dramatic drop in purchasing power or even businesses needing to close. It is impactful.
When the price continues to be high, the impact remains. The pain continues, the problem is not solved. The politically smart messaging is to say "we feel and acknowledge your continued pain, this is what we're going to do about it", not "Good news! Inflation is 0%."
Same with the opportunistic messaging of sometimes using MoM or YoY, whichever number looks better. When MoM inflation in October is 15% and 5% in November, you really shouldn't bring this as good news. The situation still got worse in the real world.
mattferderer|3 years ago
coding123|3 years ago
0x445442|3 years ago
Spooky23|3 years ago
It’s a major reason why society spends so much on education. Stupid people make poor citizens.
impulser_|3 years ago
olivermarks|3 years ago
KptMarchewa|3 years ago
Am4TIfIsER0ppos|3 years ago
thomastjeffery|3 years ago
It would have been much clearer for them to say, "The increase has slowed."
onion2k|3 years ago
laweijfmvo|3 years ago
germandiago|3 years ago
These explanations are very necessary so that people develop an intuition of what is going on.
giantg2|3 years ago
Edit: there are some people saying it's a myth, or not a complete picture. Looks like we don't have the data. But my point is that we aren't very good with numbers or economics.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fractions-where-i...
https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2018/september/how...
lordnacho|3 years ago
nashashmi|3 years ago
onlyrealcuzzo|3 years ago
bryanlarsen|3 years ago
nemo44x|3 years ago
alooPotato|3 years ago
randomdata|3 years ago
boppo1|3 years ago
danielmarkbruce|3 years ago
Had we just reported a month on month -0.4% instead of 0.4%, the yoy rate would have been reported as 6.9%. A headline of 6.9% would mean prices are actually going down.
meragrin_|3 years ago
lottin|3 years ago
giantg2|3 years ago
msoad|3 years ago
That’s the number that matters in a forward looking instrument like the market
la64710|3 years ago
Green_man|3 years ago
Or is this a specific criticism of a regulatory blind spot for reigning in market power? Monopolies can get away with price increases now, but they wouldn't normally?
jliptzin|3 years ago
rzimmerman|3 years ago
This is actually great (if noisy) news. 2 months of 0.4% CPI increase is equivalent to 5% yearly inflation. But the YoY is still high because it was much worse 8-12 months ago.
I hadn’t even considered that people will think low numbers are a lie because prices don’t go down. But of course (sadly) you’re right.
lupire|3 years ago
ajross|3 years ago
This part is true.
> that means your groceries are going to be x% higher than in 2020
But this part jumps right back into the much bigger fallacy that inflation represents a change in value and not price! Sure, groceries are higher in price, just like your assets are higher in value (on average) and your wages are higher (on average).
But in any case, your notion that inflation isn't instantaneously halted is a little spun. In fact month-to-month CPI change for October is 0.4%, which corresponds to about 4.9% per year. That's higher than we've seen for most of the last decade, but not a number most people would consider "high" in the sense of "disruptive to economic activity".
anyonecancode|3 years ago
WanderPanda|3 years ago
I think the best way to understand it is to just look at the index itself [1] and not the first or second derivative.
[1] https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/consumer-price-in...
kelnos|3 years ago
The only thing we can hope for is that, as inflation numbers continue dropping back toward "normal", wage increases will eventually catch up and make those already-higher prices less difficult to swallow. Of course, it never works out that neatly.
amanj41|3 years ago
citilife|3 years ago
I've been tracking my expenses since 2015 and they're up around ~50% since then, for effectively the same food (eggs, bread, meat, etc). I eat ~2800-3000 calories per day (which I also track) and that's been consistent.
According to BLS it should be up only 27%, but everyone knows that's just not true. Remember ~1 year ago when the administration was calling prices "transitory", that means they're claiming a larger elasticity in prices so inflation doesn't look bad because they believe they'll come back down (soon).
danielmarkbruce|3 years ago
sonthonax|3 years ago
Victerius|3 years ago
contravariant|3 years ago
The difference is important, especially because we're looking at a yearly increase every month. The derivative of the annual inflation is not d^2p/dt^2 but (dp(t)/dt - dp(t-T)/dt).
queuebert|3 years ago
redox99|3 years ago
It means CPI_oct22 - CPI_oct21 < CPI_sep22 - CPI_sep21
d^2p/dt^2 isn't necessarily negative.
compumike|3 years ago
https://totalrealreturns.com/s/USDOLLAR?start=2021-11-10&end...
or over a longer time period: https://totalrealreturns.com/s/USDOLLAR
(this site is my side project)
If "p" is the relative price level index (CPI-U in this case), then "1/p" represents the relative purchasing power of a single dollar over time -- explained on homepage in more detail.
fakethenews2022|3 years ago
fakethenews2022|3 years ago
Ar-Curunir|3 years ago
maratc|3 years ago
idontpost|3 years ago
[deleted]
FollowingTheDao|3 years ago
A good time to but the 10 year Bond IMHO.
datalopers|3 years ago
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]