Hopefully that means they'll be opening a data center in Australia before too long.
EDIT: To expand on where I'm coming from, I'm the technical lead at a web agency in Melbourne so I make recommendations on what hosting providers we use, both for our staging servers and live servers for our customers' sites.
We already have a few staging and live servers with AWS in California, but for most live servers we have to use Australian hosting providers for lower latency and (sometimes) for legal reasons regarding storage of customer data. I guarantee that if AWS were to open a facility in Australia, all of our hosting would move to that facility ASAP.
I've been hearing stronger and stronger rumours about them opening in Sydney sometime soon, most often linked to a partnership with Equinix's big new datacenter in Alexandria...
Have you considered OrionVM? The guys running that are amongst the smartest, keenest people I've ever met, and their setup seems second-to-none. Well worth checking out if you need Australian-based cloud hosting.
I second that, as do many others on AWS forums (https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?messageID=271852). Other comment in this discussion is that this new Sao Paulo region is more expensive than the rest of them - I guess it would be the same (probably even more expensive) for Australia. However I'm sure that many AWS customers would be more than happy to pay for it. Without it, CloudFront is not truly global.
What about Asia-Pacific? We have a service in AU which currently we're serving from our US-East servers, and I just assumed we would want to move to AP when we could, but is it not better than US-West?
Anything to shake up the Australian hosting market would be welcome! We just ditched our AU CDN because it wasn't nearly as reliable as it should be, and very expensive to boot!
I hope so too. Bandwidth and hosting prices are outrageous. VPS rates are terrible too, though some vendors seem to have gotten the message in the last year or so.
It worries me slightly the way AWS adds new regions with wildly fluctuating prices. We currently serve a decent amount of traffic in the US, over CloudFront. We also have some clients in South America, currently being served by the US pops. While speed isn't great, it's decent enough for what we're doing (simple jpg serving).
With AWS opening up a new pop in South America, all of a sudden, whatever traffic we have to South America is doubled in price, from one day to the other. While we don't serve enough SA traffic for that to be an issue for us, I can certainly see it becoming an issue.
As a customer I'd like to see an announcement of new regions some time in advance so I can prepare for the potential economic impact. Or perhaps an option to simply disable certain CloudFront pops if I don't care about them.
The entire IT "value chain" in Brazil (specially in São Paulo) is more expensive than any other location in the US. Honestly I'm surprised they could keep the overall price increase at around 36%. If you take real estate cost + taxes + data transfer costs alone, that would be enough to push operating costs way up. Labor cost could also be a big factor here, since payroll taxes are around 100% (for $1 pay to employee you give another $1 to goverment in taxes), but of course they have all the technology to put high degrees of automation to their benefit.
Presumably power and/or network connectivity are more expensive, and they have to pass on the prices. Also, given the high cost of disks these days, it's not surprising EBS prices would be high in a newly opened region...
Honestly, I'm surprised how cheap that is. If you take into consideration that computers cost between 2x and 3x more, bandwidth 4x more, higher taxes and almost the same wages, it's a steal.
I expected it to cost between 2 to 3 times more.
Our current providers tend to cost 4x to 8x that, so I'm really curious to see how the market will behave.
I once hosted a Zope site on three different datacenters - one for the ZEO server (the object store) and two others for the clients (the front-end/app logic). Worked well enough (Zope caches things very efficiently).
No. I really didn't needed to do it - I just wanted to know if it would work. I suspect a similar approach with light front-ends on low latency regions with heavy loads on cheaper regions would be a good technique depending on your problem.
Brazil's once largest airline used Zope a lot and not even they had problems that needed solving this aggressively.
Now that I am writing this, I remember there was a government (Plone-based) site that suffered a major data-center outage and we quickly switched to running their Varnishes in Brasilia off our mirror in São Paulo for weeks. Nobody outside the technical team noticed.
I was lucky to be in Sao Paulo for a few weeks, setting up some trading systems. I think people generally underestimate Brazil's potential. Locals apparently joke that Brazil is the country of the future, and always will be. Lucky for them, the future has arrived. The enthusiasm of the locals (at least the elite) is infectious.
I heard a funny (and somewhat racist) comment there from someone who was explaining why Brazil is far more interesting than China or India: 'Brazil is basically a Western country. Would you rather go to China and eat frogs or go to India and eat spices so hot that they make you sweat?
Brazil is on fire. Flush with oil money, 90% of electricity from renewable sources, a bottomless pit of energy and enthusiasm being held back only by corruption.
Netflix, Rd.io, Senzari and iTunes Store have launched locally in just the past 2 months. Next year I think we'll watch a few good fights on the consumer apps and SaaS spaces. Internet usage will hit the 100m mark.
São Paulo, it's there on the page you linked to. If it were spanish it would be san paolo.
On a more relevant note, finally. Google has had servers around here for a few years, along with most large CDNs. Cloudflare should take note, it's nearly unusable in Brazil right now.
[+] [-] jbarham|14 years ago|reply
EDIT: To expand on where I'm coming from, I'm the technical lead at a web agency in Melbourne so I make recommendations on what hosting providers we use, both for our staging servers and live servers for our customers' sites.
We already have a few staging and live servers with AWS in California, but for most live servers we have to use Australian hosting providers for lower latency and (sometimes) for legal reasons regarding storage of customer data. I guarantee that if AWS were to open a facility in Australia, all of our hosting would move to that facility ASAP.
[+] [-] bigiain|14 years ago|reply
(google google google) here: http://www.itnews.com.au/News/280702,amazon-chooses-sydney-f...
And searching Amazon.com's careers section shows vacancies for Data Center Ops Manager and various other management positions.
_Surely_ it'll be soon?
[+] [-] jlangenauer|14 years ago|reply
http://orionvm.com.au/
(Note, I'm not a investor or employee - I merely used to share an office with them and saw how they worked.)
[+] [-] ypcx|14 years ago|reply
EDIT: please fill out this AWS survey, apparently this could potentially speed up adding the Australian region: http://aws.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_9yvAN5PK8abJIFK
[+] [-] dasil003|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ajtaylor|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jbyers|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bodhi|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jcampbell1|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] orcadk|14 years ago|reply
With AWS opening up a new pop in South America, all of a sudden, whatever traffic we have to South America is doubled in price, from one day to the other. While we don't serve enough SA traffic for that to be an issue for us, I can certainly see it becoming an issue.
As a customer I'd like to see an announcement of new regions some time in advance so I can prepare for the potential economic impact. Or perhaps an option to simply disable certain CloudFront pops if I don't care about them.
[+] [-] panarky|14 years ago|reply
http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/
EBS volumes are 90% more expensive, and data transfer is 200% higher.
Much higher than US, EU, Asia Pacific. Are costs in South America that much more than the rest of the world?
[+] [-] rarruda|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bdonlan|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jl6|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] arthur_debert|14 years ago|reply
I expected it to cost between 2 to 3 times more.
Our current providers tend to cost 4x to 8x that, so I'm really curious to see how the market will behave.
[+] [-] postit|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] smokinn|14 years ago|reply
Of the top of my head:
Supplier costs
Volume discounts smaller (until they scale up more at least)
Infrastructure partners more limited and costly
etc, etc
[+] [-] brianbreslin|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rbanffy|14 years ago|reply
No. I really didn't needed to do it - I just wanted to know if it would work. I suspect a similar approach with light front-ends on low latency regions with heavy loads on cheaper regions would be a good technique depending on your problem.
Brazil's once largest airline used Zope a lot and not even they had problems that needed solving this aggressively.
Now that I am writing this, I remember there was a government (Plone-based) site that suffered a major data-center outage and we quickly switched to running their Varnishes in Brasilia off our mirror in São Paulo for weeks. Nobody outside the technical team noticed.
[+] [-] paperwork|14 years ago|reply
I heard a funny (and somewhat racist) comment there from someone who was explaining why Brazil is far more interesting than China or India: 'Brazil is basically a Western country. Would you rather go to China and eat frogs or go to India and eat spices so hot that they make you sweat?
[+] [-] jl6|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ricardobeat|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gldalmaso|14 years ago|reply
Even though there was visible growth in recent years, people continue saying stuff like that.
[+] [-] jbyers|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] prakash|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ricardobeat|14 years ago|reply
On a more relevant note, finally. Google has had servers around here for a few years, along with most large CDNs. Cloudflare should take note, it's nearly unusable in Brazil right now.
[+] [-] teoruiz|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jeffbarr|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] swah|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] slig|14 years ago|reply
I don't think I'll move anytime soon. What I'm considering is hosting only the CSS on CloudFront and keep the rest on linode.
[+] [-] swah|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] swah|14 years ago|reply
But "sa-east-1.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com" is an alias for "us-west-2.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com", so I can't ping it.
[+] [-] vierja|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mixmastamyk|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cfontes|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] brianbreslin|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Hikari|14 years ago|reply