top | item 3354976

New AWS Region in Sao Paulo, Brazil

86 points| jeffbarr | 14 years ago |aws.typepad.com | reply

57 comments

order
[+] jbarham|14 years ago|reply
Hopefully that means they'll be opening a data center in Australia before too long.

EDIT: To expand on where I'm coming from, I'm the technical lead at a web agency in Melbourne so I make recommendations on what hosting providers we use, both for our staging servers and live servers for our customers' sites.

We already have a few staging and live servers with AWS in California, but for most live servers we have to use Australian hosting providers for lower latency and (sometimes) for legal reasons regarding storage of customer data. I guarantee that if AWS were to open a facility in Australia, all of our hosting would move to that facility ASAP.

[+] bigiain|14 years ago|reply
I've been hearing stronger and stronger rumours about them opening in Sydney sometime soon, most often linked to a partnership with Equinix's big new datacenter in Alexandria...

(google google google) here: http://www.itnews.com.au/News/280702,amazon-chooses-sydney-f...

And searching Amazon.com's careers section shows vacancies for Data Center Ops Manager and various other management positions.

_Surely_ it'll be soon?

[+] jlangenauer|14 years ago|reply
Have you considered OrionVM? The guys running that are amongst the smartest, keenest people I've ever met, and their setup seems second-to-none. Well worth checking out if you need Australian-based cloud hosting.

http://orionvm.com.au/

(Note, I'm not a investor or employee - I merely used to share an office with them and saw how they worked.)

[+] ypcx|14 years ago|reply
I second that, as do many others on AWS forums (https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?messageID=271852). Other comment in this discussion is that this new Sao Paulo region is more expensive than the rest of them - I guess it would be the same (probably even more expensive) for Australia. However I'm sure that many AWS customers would be more than happy to pay for it. Without it, CloudFront is not truly global.

EDIT: please fill out this AWS survey, apparently this could potentially speed up adding the Australian region: http://aws.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_9yvAN5PK8abJIFK

[+] dasil003|14 years ago|reply
What about Asia-Pacific? We have a service in AU which currently we're serving from our US-East servers, and I just assumed we would want to move to AP when we could, but is it not better than US-West?
[+] ajtaylor|14 years ago|reply
Anything to shake up the Australian hosting market would be welcome! We just ditched our AU CDN because it wasn't nearly as reliable as it should be, and very expensive to boot!
[+] jbyers|14 years ago|reply
I hope so too. Bandwidth and hosting prices are outrageous. VPS rates are terrible too, though some vendors seem to have gotten the message in the last year or so.
[+] bodhi|14 years ago|reply
Sorry to be slightly off-topic, but who would you recommend for Australian hosting, in place of EC2 US-west?
[+] jcampbell1|14 years ago|reply
Amazon doesn't even have cloudfront service there. It is pitiful. The convicts and kiwis are 10% of my business; I wish they got better service.
[+] orcadk|14 years ago|reply
It worries me slightly the way AWS adds new regions with wildly fluctuating prices. We currently serve a decent amount of traffic in the US, over CloudFront. We also have some clients in South America, currently being served by the US pops. While speed isn't great, it's decent enough for what we're doing (simple jpg serving).

With AWS opening up a new pop in South America, all of a sudden, whatever traffic we have to South America is doubled in price, from one day to the other. While we don't serve enough SA traffic for that to be an issue for us, I can certainly see it becoming an issue.

As a customer I'd like to see an announcement of new regions some time in advance so I can prepare for the potential economic impact. Or perhaps an option to simply disable certain CloudFront pops if I don't care about them.

[+] panarky|14 years ago|reply
Why are EC2 and S3 in São Paulo 36% more expensive than US-East?

http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/

EBS volumes are 90% more expensive, and data transfer is 200% higher.

Much higher than US, EU, Asia Pacific. Are costs in South America that much more than the rest of the world?

[+] rarruda|14 years ago|reply
The entire IT "value chain" in Brazil (specially in São Paulo) is more expensive than any other location in the US. Honestly I'm surprised they could keep the overall price increase at around 36%. If you take real estate cost + taxes + data transfer costs alone, that would be enough to push operating costs way up. Labor cost could also be a big factor here, since payroll taxes are around 100% (for $1 pay to employee you give another $1 to goverment in taxes), but of course they have all the technology to put high degrees of automation to their benefit.
[+] bdonlan|14 years ago|reply
Presumably power and/or network connectivity are more expensive, and they have to pass on the prices. Also, given the high cost of disks these days, it's not surprising EBS prices would be high in a newly opened region...
[+] jl6|14 years ago|reply
Brazil has a 60% import tax. Not sure if this applies to everything but it does to individuals and small businesses.
[+] arthur_debert|14 years ago|reply
Honestly, I'm surprised how cheap that is. If you take into consideration that computers cost between 2x and 3x more, bandwidth 4x more, higher taxes and almost the same wages, it's a steal.

I expected it to cost between 2 to 3 times more.

Our current providers tend to cost 4x to 8x that, so I'm really curious to see how the market will behave.

[+] postit|14 years ago|reply
Taxes, we have this service tax billed in são paulo that increases the price.
[+] smokinn|14 years ago|reply
I imagine there's a large number of reasons.

Of the top of my head:

Supplier costs

Volume discounts smaller (until they scale up more at least)

Infrastructure partners more limited and costly

etc, etc

[+] brianbreslin|14 years ago|reply
Real estate there is insanely expensive. Bandwidth is also likely pricier too. So datacenters will cost more.
[+] rbanffy|14 years ago|reply
I once hosted a Zope site on three different datacenters - one for the ZEO server (the object store) and two others for the clients (the front-end/app logic). Worked well enough (Zope caches things very efficiently).

No. I really didn't needed to do it - I just wanted to know if it would work. I suspect a similar approach with light front-ends on low latency regions with heavy loads on cheaper regions would be a good technique depending on your problem.

Brazil's once largest airline used Zope a lot and not even they had problems that needed solving this aggressively.

Now that I am writing this, I remember there was a government (Plone-based) site that suffered a major data-center outage and we quickly switched to running their Varnishes in Brasilia off our mirror in São Paulo for weeks. Nobody outside the technical team noticed.

[+] paperwork|14 years ago|reply
I was lucky to be in Sao Paulo for a few weeks, setting up some trading systems. I think people generally underestimate Brazil's potential. Locals apparently joke that Brazil is the country of the future, and always will be. Lucky for them, the future has arrived. The enthusiasm of the locals (at least the elite) is infectious.

I heard a funny (and somewhat racist) comment there from someone who was explaining why Brazil is far more interesting than China or India: 'Brazil is basically a Western country. Would you rather go to China and eat frogs or go to India and eat spices so hot that they make you sweat?

[+] jl6|14 years ago|reply
Brazil is on fire. Flush with oil money, 90% of electricity from renewable sources, a bottomless pit of energy and enthusiasm being held back only by corruption.
[+] ricardobeat|14 years ago|reply
Netflix, Rd.io, Senzari and iTunes Store have launched locally in just the past 2 months. Next year I think we'll watch a few good fights on the consumer apps and SaaS spaces. Internet usage will hit the 100m mark.
[+] gldalmaso|14 years ago|reply
Here in Brazil, unfortunately, there is a sort of self-diminishing atittude where most people will always consider the country as an underdog.

Even though there was visible growth in recent years, people continue saying stuff like that.

[+] jbyers|14 years ago|reply
When AWS brings GeoDNS to Route53 and ELB, it's going to be a lot of fun to play in all these datacenters. I can't wait.
[+] ricardobeat|14 years ago|reply
São Paulo, it's there on the page you linked to. If it were spanish it would be san paolo.

On a more relevant note, finally. Google has had servers around here for a few years, along with most large CDNs. Cloudflare should take note, it's nearly unusable in Brazil right now.

[+] teoruiz|14 years ago|reply
Just a note: São Paulo in Brazil is named after Paul the Apostle, so in Spanish it would be San Pablo.
[+] jeffbarr|14 years ago|reply
Fixed, I keep making the same mistake. Doh!
[+] swah|14 years ago|reply
I think I'll finally stop using my Linode in Dallas (170ms delay):

    Pinging ec2-177-71-152-69.sa-east-1.compute.amazonaws.com [177.71.152.69] with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 177.71.152.69: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=43
[+] slig|14 years ago|reply
I'm on linode and I host things targeted to people here in Brazil.

I don't think I'll move anytime soon. What I'm considering is hosting only the CSS on CloudFront and keep the rest on linode.

[+] swah|14 years ago|reply
This is great. Still missing Amazon.com, the store... (quite difficult).
[+] swah|14 years ago|reply
It seems servers like "us-west-2.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com" are only acessible from that area.

But "sa-east-1.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com" is an alias for "us-west-2.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com", so I can't ping it.

[+] vierja|14 years ago|reply
Try pinging "sdb.sa-east-1.amazonaws.com". I am located in Uruguay and got an average of 100ms, compared to around 300ms for other regions.
[+] mixmastamyk|14 years ago|reply
Parabens... I've been hoping/waiting for this for a year or two now. Great work, Amazon.
[+] cfontes|14 years ago|reply
Thanks god !!! Brazil is finally being noticed by big companies.
[+] brianbreslin|14 years ago|reply
this could be useful for people targeting LatAm services. lower latency could make up a bit for slower connections throughout the region
[+] Hikari|14 years ago|reply
amazon is silently becoming a serious competitor to AKAMAI in term of location . now waiting for australia and of course China.