(no title)
manjose2018 | 3 years ago
Here is my back of the envelope math of how big I think the company should be for their main offering. Over the past years Twitter has acquired a ton of companies, but I'm going to leave them out of this equation.
Eng (250)
===========
Backend/Storage: 100 eng
Subscriptions: 50
Front-End: 50 eng
iOS App: 20 eng
Android App: 20 eng
UX: 10
Abuse/Moderation (200) ========================= Abuse: 100 Moderation: 100
Marketing/Sales (210)
=======================
PR/Marketing: 30
Ad Sales: 180
Mgmt/overhead (40)
=====================
Legal/GDPR/compliance: 20
HR/Recruiting : 10
CEO/CFO/etc.: 10
What do you think? How far off am I? If more people turn to subscriptions perhaps the abuse/moderation team will shrink in the future.
ssnistfajen|3 years ago
mrweasel|3 years ago
In all seriousness, I think many of us are falling into the trap that the PayPal guy fell into. Twitter isn't just the app and the website. So it's much harder to run and maintain than it seems like from the outside. If it was just the Tweets, why would they ever need more than 10 iOS developers for instance?
If we cut Twitter into what it is on the surface, and perhaps lose some data retention, then sliming down the engineering organization significantly should be possible with the right people. Not to 50, that's really low for a platform the size of Twitter. That being said: 7500 employees is also way to many for what they do, or at least for how little money they make.
TylerE|3 years ago
Thats 1.7M tweets a day per moderator. A bit over 3500 per minute.
And thats assuming they work 7 days a week, never get sick, never take vacation.
davidguetta|3 years ago
DrBenCarson|3 years ago
dist1ll|3 years ago
layer8|3 years ago
myroon5|3 years ago
https://sacks.substack.com/p/the-saas-org-chart
phillipcarter|3 years ago
cromka|3 years ago
mkl95|3 years ago