top | item 3358497

Can't solve a quintic? Galois Theory in 1500 words

71 points| ColinWright | 14 years ago |lisazhang.ca | reply

27 comments

order
[+] nagrom|14 years ago|reply
The background story of Évariste Galois is phenomenal. He was expelled from school twice, fought in a revolutionary unit, was imprisoned for threatening the life of the king and revolutionised mathematics forever. He died in a duel over a woman at the age of 20! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Évariste_Galois

Imagine what he would have done if he had lived to 40? There were some really fascinating characters in the mathematics in the 19th century. A very far stretch from the world's stereotypes of a repressed, bespectacled geek or the boring image of mathematics given by high school classes.

[+] JoeCamel|14 years ago|reply
Genius and Biographers: The Fictionalization of Evariste Galois by Tony Rothman http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~trothman/galois.html

"This article is an attempt to sift some of the facts of Galois's life from the embroidery. It will not be an entirely complete account and will assume the reader is familiar with the story, presumably through Bell's version. Because these authors have emphasized the end of Galois's life, I will do so here. As will become apparent, many of the statements just cited are at at worst nonsensical, or at best have no basis in the known facts."

[+] huhtenberg|14 years ago|reply
> Imagine what he would have done if he had lived to 40?

Sorry, can't. Marriage alone is a major productivity killer, then there are also kids and general life problems. There was a study that basically built a histogram of mathematicians' (?) productivity vs age. The peak was around 25 years old, followed by a very steep decline.

[+] InclinedPlane|14 years ago|reply
Imagine how many geniuses of Galois' caliber have come and gone in the last 2 centuries but never had a chance to make a significant contribution to the world due to being discouraged or oppressed by a suffocating school system or a dysfunctional family life that drove them onto a different track.
[+] mahmud|14 years ago|reply
Pro-tip for self-taught mathos: It's pronounced "Gal-wah theory". Also, "Lee groups", "Paul Erdish", "Kurt Gurdle", "Leonhard 'Oiler'", etc.
[+] waqf|14 years ago|reply
Don't forget Lebayg integration.
[+] Natsu|14 years ago|reply
Sometimes it's more fun to tell non-mathematicians that you're reading something about "lie groups" just to see their reaction....
[+] JadeNB|14 years ago|reply
On the other hand, mathematicians at the University of Chicago learn quickly that the name of Valois Cafeteria (http://www.valoisrestaurant.com) is not pronounced the way that they think it is.
[+] frobozz|14 years ago|reply
Definitely "Leonhard", not "Lennad"?
[+] grot|14 years ago|reply
When I was learning Galois Theory, I found Keith Conrad's notes really helpful for understanding the details -- http://www.math.uconn.edu/~kconrad/blurbs/. The subject of this post is mostly covered by the paper titled "Galois correspondence" (For anyone whose interests were piqued by this post.)
[+] balsam|14 years ago|reply
Mark Kac and Stanislaw Ulam explained these concepts pretty intuitively in their beautiful book Mathematics and Logic. But, who was the first person who thought that mathematics could be explained without diagrams? Or equations?

Edit: In particular they showed on pages 58-60, without using jargon, how the idea of permutations leads to Cardano's formulas for the cubic.

[+] codebaobab|14 years ago|reply
Does anyone have any insight into how Galois made the mental leap to his solution? Everything I've read says (or implies) that his solution came completely out of left-field--i.e. it wasn't really related to anything that had come before him.

And along those lines, does anyone know of an English translation of Galois' paper?

[+] sovande|14 years ago|reply
Samuel Johnson: ''Nothing focuses the mind like a hanging'' Or in Galois case a duel.
[+] gujk|14 years ago|reply
I recently started reading now algebra book with a goal of understanding the Galois theoretical proof of his understanding unsolvability of the Quintic. This is generally considered the capstone of a complete 2-semester undergraduate study of algebra for a math major who is not pursuing graduate level pure math.

The interesting part IMO is the analysis of those normal subgroup chains and understanding the isomorphism to splitting fields.

Definitions and theorems without proofs or examples or illustrations is like the box without the gift inside. That post built up a pile of terminology but then ended before showing any content. It shows where to look out find the solutions at least.

[+] Someone|14 years ago|reply
Nice text, but "This is a very limited set of operations, and certainly not all real numbers can be written this way -- π clearly can’t be written this way." caught my attention. I know it is true, if that is 'clear', one can just as well claim "clearly, quintics cannot be solved" and be done with it.
[+] eric-hu|14 years ago|reply
yes. The proof that pi is transcendental is hardly trivial. This was one of the three major milestones for my Galois Theory class.

Even proving that it's irrational is nontrivial

[+] krevis|14 years ago|reply
Just remember: the Galois extension of a Galois extension is not necessarily Galois.

(Never took number theory myself, but that was the one thing I learned from those who did.)