top | item 33598431

(no title)

rodelrod | 3 years ago

This is mostly correct, but I don't see how it contradicts my statement.

Did the 646 standard account for variable-width characters at all?

discuss

order

TheRealPomax|3 years ago

Not so much contradict as wondering about the claim that it should be a specific Unicode codepoint when Unicode wasn't around when we started "computering" text (and the Académie Française can't have possibly formally declared things in terms of Unicode =)

What are the actual official rules in this case (and are there links to those? Because that'd be fascinating information to read through)?