(no title)
srejk | 3 years ago
Trains require a lot of energy to get started (where batteries work well), but then a relatively small trickle of power is needed: hydrogen fills this niche. Big companies are investing billions into this right now.
srejk | 3 years ago
Trains require a lot of energy to get started (where batteries work well), but then a relatively small trickle of power is needed: hydrogen fills this niche. Big companies are investing billions into this right now.
bryanlarsen|3 years ago
That problem is now gone, batteries can be used to bridge gaps in the catenary wires.
srejk|3 years ago
ed: Not saying that all trains should be hydrogen, there just are use cases for some when we're talking zero-emission.
_hypx|3 years ago
pencilguin|3 years ago
An extra insulated car filled with lightweight LH2 would not appreciably increase the cost of operating a train.
Liquified ammonia under low pressure might be more practical, if safety worries don't dominate. We already move tanks of ammonia on trains. And much worse.
giarc|3 years ago
dontlaugh|3 years ago
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]
Vvector|3 years ago
Kuinox|3 years ago
kobalsky|3 years ago
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]