top | item 33636298 (no title) vegai_ | 3 years ago Well, you've met one now, so you can update that assumption. And also if you look higher up this thread, the author of this article takes it seriously as well. So that's two already in a pretty short time! discuss order hn newest eska|3 years ago The comment you’re referring to merely refrains from making a value judgment, while you’re turning it into an approval of OOP. vegai_|3 years ago >Thinking in OOP terms in, say, Java is great.How did you interpret this statement? load replies (1)
eska|3 years ago The comment you’re referring to merely refrains from making a value judgment, while you’re turning it into an approval of OOP. vegai_|3 years ago >Thinking in OOP terms in, say, Java is great.How did you interpret this statement? load replies (1)
vegai_|3 years ago >Thinking in OOP terms in, say, Java is great.How did you interpret this statement? load replies (1)
eska|3 years ago
vegai_|3 years ago
How did you interpret this statement?