top | item 33638821

Everything in Tech Seems to Be Collapsing at Once

26 points| samizdis | 3 years ago |theatlantic.com

18 comments

order
[+] rocket_surgeron|3 years ago|reply
What is happening today is no different from what has happened an uncountably numerous number of times before.

In my lifetime alone I've seen the "collapse" of the non-x86 personal computer industry, the dot-com bubble, the "collapse" of UNIX firms, the Great Recession, wave after wave of defense/electronics/space industry consolidations and contractions, and several other events that have caused certain people to believe that the sky is falling.

Over and over and over, the sky has fallen. We must be buried under hundreds of layers of sky by now.

Now Twitter, a borderline-irrelevant microblogging platform that could easily be replaced by any number of competitors in a week if it disappeared into a puff of smoke, is causing people to lose their god damned minds.

I saw an article that included a quote from a current or former Twitter employee saying that "the world needs twitter now more than ever" and I think I may have started to throw up in my mouth a little bit.

Every other one of the companies listed in the article is either shitting the bed in terms of performance and needs to tighten the belt, or massively over-hired in the last two years. It is highly unlikely that any one of the recently laid-off employees who want a job will be unable to find one before their severance runs out.

I believe that I may have officially become out of touch.

[+] thomascgalvin|3 years ago|reply
> I saw an article that included a quote from a current or former Twitter employee saying that "the world needs twitter now more than ever" and I think I may have started to throw up in my mouth a little bit.

Social media has, I believe, been a net negative for the world. The echo chamber it creates is too strong, pushing people into more and more extreme worldviews. There is no more honest dialog, no more meeting of the minds. There is "us" and "them", and "them" is often seen as less than human.

If Elon does destroy Twitter, it might be the single greatest contribution to humanity he ever makes.

[+] carapace|3 years ago|reply
A friend of mine was telling me about some Twitterati whinging about "the pain" of switching from Twitter to (e.g.) Mastodon, and I had to stop him. At moments like these I'm always reminded of the Jetsons arguing over who's going to push the button to make dinner. You don't even have to get out of your chair!?

And, again, this is only a problem in the first place because they voluntarily gave their agency to a corporation that doesn't have their interests at heart.

[+] christkv|3 years ago|reply
Free money dried up. You can’t bankroll losses with loans at close to 0% interest and thus spending discipline has to happen. Stock and valuation took a big hit and it’s harder to raise or sell stock to offset loses.

We will see a lot of gobbling up of small companies as the cash rich companies can shop for bargains over the next year or more.

[+] FooBarBizBazz|3 years ago|reply
I've been watching huge panics and euphorias sweep over society over and over for the past five years. It's like all the emotions are just too large. The results are surreal. It's like living in a carnival. I'm at a rodeo, and riding a steer with bipolar disorder.
[+] gangstead|3 years ago|reply
"Gradually, then suddenly" - Ernest Hemingway, about going bankrupt in _The Sun Also Rises_

It seems sudden but I feel like there's been a slow downward spiral. Maybe we HN readers are just early adopters and found out a before the wider economy could react.

[+] cpascal|3 years ago|reply
> Ten years from now, looking back on the 2022 tech recession, we may say that this moment was a paroxysm of scandals and layoffs between two discrete movements.

The author is suggesting the first "movement" was the "browser era, the social-media era, and the smartphone-app-economy era".

It seems they think the next era will vaguely have something to do with AI.

What do HN'ers think the next "movement" will be (if any)?

[+] uni_rule|3 years ago|reply
In my opinion it might be more disparate if people's hardware specs can afford it, trading centralization for peer to peer or federated services at the expense of creating even greater filter bubbles. That or non-centralized web things are just fashionable to talk about and I am blindly regurgitating trends. 50-50 really, half of those conversations were spurred on by crypto wank and those types aren't exactly having a good time right now.
[+] vsskanth|3 years ago|reply
Ad money still seems to be flowing, with slower growth.
[+] matt_s|3 years ago|reply
Source for that?

Major layoffs from companies that have advertising revenue as their main source of revenue is kind of a signal that ad spend might drop a lot.

[+] yucky|3 years ago|reply
Driven by political spending, which is now done. You'll get a bit of a Holiday bump and then...what?
[+] throwaway23236|3 years ago|reply
I cannot read the whole article because of the paywall, but I do find it ironic that "tech" consists of Meta, Twitter, Salesforce, Stripe, and some other companies while there are hundreds of smaller tech companies that seem to be doing ok.

Some of the above companies have become huge monoliths and this is the market adjusting itself. The companies growth has slowed and smaller, leaner, more agile companies are out maneuvering them.

It sucks to see people losing their jobs and getting laid off, but the recession and closing market space has triggered off more wartime CEO actions instead of peacetime CEO. Instead of expanding, these leaders realized their expansion is or has come to an end and instead they are cutting all the excess they can to stay afloat.

And while I do not like Elon Musk or Mark Zuckerberg, I think they are reading the market correctly on what is coming and what they can do to put their businesses in the right place for the future.

[+] squaredot|3 years ago|reply
I agree. The other day someone commenting the layoffs of meta, noted that the company has still more employees than at the end of last year. These changes are bad for the people involved, but even if the numbers are big, their relative amount (percentage) seems to me more like a temporary swing.