top | item 33644074 (no title) nyreed | 3 years ago Does this have advantages over .webarchive? discuss order hn newest gildas|3 years ago Only Safari can open .webarchive files. Files saved with SingleFile can be opened in any browser (without needing to install any extension).Edit: I just did a test with https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/nov/17/three-men-foun.... The CSS of the resulting webarchive is very broken and the file weights 4 times more than the one saved with SingleFile. russellbeattie|3 years ago .webarchive is just a binary plist, only works on Apple OSes and has security issues. I posted about the various ways to encapsulate HTML last week, including SingleFile, for those who are interested.https://www.russellbeattie.com/notes/posts/the-decades-long-...
gildas|3 years ago Only Safari can open .webarchive files. Files saved with SingleFile can be opened in any browser (without needing to install any extension).Edit: I just did a test with https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/nov/17/three-men-foun.... The CSS of the resulting webarchive is very broken and the file weights 4 times more than the one saved with SingleFile.
russellbeattie|3 years ago .webarchive is just a binary plist, only works on Apple OSes and has security issues. I posted about the various ways to encapsulate HTML last week, including SingleFile, for those who are interested.https://www.russellbeattie.com/notes/posts/the-decades-long-...
gildas|3 years ago
Edit: I just did a test with https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/nov/17/three-men-foun.... The CSS of the resulting webarchive is very broken and the file weights 4 times more than the one saved with SingleFile.
russellbeattie|3 years ago
https://www.russellbeattie.com/notes/posts/the-decades-long-...