[asojfdowgh]

To explain why the content seemingly evades the law: the article is consistently referring to drawn / computer generated content.

The legality of which can be gleaned from here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional_porn...

I find that the seemingly intentional foot-noting of the class of content they are talking about, to be really dishonest.

[BuleBule]

I wasn't trying to be dishonest, possession of the material you are referring to is a serious federal crime in the United States. Furthermore, I find it sickening that some of you do not agree with me, or the law, on this subject and think it's ok.

Lolicon is child sexual abuse material.