[1ris]

I understand your argument. It works with starting from a massive misrepresentation of what I have said (aka bad faith). Your argument is fatally flawed due to the reason i stated. And that's why there is nothing to be said to the substance, other than what was written and this discussion was and remains over.

[optymizer]

> It works with starting from a massive misrepresentation of what I have said

It does not misrepresent what you said, and failure to see that means you did not actually understand it

> Your argument is fatally flawed due to the reason i stated

This is then false as well, and my argument stands.

> this discussion was and remains over

It's good to agree

[1ris]

>It does not misrepresent what you said, and failure to see that means you did not actually understand it

Oh yes, I do. I do know what i mean and I can see that your quote of it was either extremely unintelligent, something you can by definition not see, or intentionally miss representing and therefore bad faith and therefore something you by definition lie about.

I'm heavily leaning to bad faith, because you never make any attempts to refute arguments anywhere in the whole thread.

So, of course, I'm obviously correct on on this one, so it's good thing either of us wasted any time talking on the substance.