top | item 33675058 (no title) adamsbriscoe | 3 years ago Not sure what you're referring to but it's not 1 percent.. it's not even 0.01 percent.Cursory search: https://www.webmd.com/parenting/baby/news/20190503/study-abo... discuss order hn newest socialismisok|3 years ago That link says 0.13%, first off, and it only includes people who have visible genital differences.Many, many more people have different genetic configurations that can manifest well after birth.I'll admit I rounded up to one percent from something that was a large fractional percent. unknown|3 years ago [deleted] snoozing|3 years ago 0.13% -> 1% doesn’t feel like rounding (it’s actually nearly a 10x change). 0.13 is not a large fraction.Assuming good intentions based on your other comments, but these things can elicit negative responses. load replies (1)
socialismisok|3 years ago That link says 0.13%, first off, and it only includes people who have visible genital differences.Many, many more people have different genetic configurations that can manifest well after birth.I'll admit I rounded up to one percent from something that was a large fractional percent. unknown|3 years ago [deleted] snoozing|3 years ago 0.13% -> 1% doesn’t feel like rounding (it’s actually nearly a 10x change). 0.13 is not a large fraction.Assuming good intentions based on your other comments, but these things can elicit negative responses. load replies (1)
snoozing|3 years ago 0.13% -> 1% doesn’t feel like rounding (it’s actually nearly a 10x change). 0.13 is not a large fraction.Assuming good intentions based on your other comments, but these things can elicit negative responses. load replies (1)
socialismisok|3 years ago
Many, many more people have different genetic configurations that can manifest well after birth.
I'll admit I rounded up to one percent from something that was a large fractional percent.
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]
snoozing|3 years ago
Assuming good intentions based on your other comments, but these things can elicit negative responses.