top | item 33733390 (no title) nells | 3 years ago You can also price it at $0 and NOT ban it. discuss order hn newest piva00|3 years ago And why would you price it at $0 if it's already known it does cause damages. Just because you can't fairly price it doesn't mean it costs zero, that's an absurd logic... 0xfffafaCrash|3 years ago Sure, but that does nothing to help with the tragedy of the commons caused by unaddressed negative externalities… nells|3 years ago This is more like the politician's syllogism.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politician%27s_syllogism load replies (1)
piva00|3 years ago And why would you price it at $0 if it's already known it does cause damages. Just because you can't fairly price it doesn't mean it costs zero, that's an absurd logic...
0xfffafaCrash|3 years ago Sure, but that does nothing to help with the tragedy of the commons caused by unaddressed negative externalities… nells|3 years ago This is more like the politician's syllogism.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politician%27s_syllogism load replies (1)
nells|3 years ago This is more like the politician's syllogism.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politician%27s_syllogism load replies (1)
piva00|3 years ago
0xfffafaCrash|3 years ago
nells|3 years ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politician%27s_syllogism