top | item 33735473 (no title) bambambazooka | 3 years ago Can you elaborate a bit? Do you mount something like a S3 bucket inside of a container? discuss order hn newest garganzol|3 years ago Yes, exactly. The mount point is then used as a general disk for container data. mixmastamyk|3 years ago Interesting, so why do that? Is it just to simplify your client code? Instead of using the s3 api, you just save files in a standard (virtual) file system? Any other benefits or reliability/performance drawbacks?Maybe to avoid uuids and use standard fs paths? load replies (2)
garganzol|3 years ago Yes, exactly. The mount point is then used as a general disk for container data. mixmastamyk|3 years ago Interesting, so why do that? Is it just to simplify your client code? Instead of using the s3 api, you just save files in a standard (virtual) file system? Any other benefits or reliability/performance drawbacks?Maybe to avoid uuids and use standard fs paths? load replies (2)
mixmastamyk|3 years ago Interesting, so why do that? Is it just to simplify your client code? Instead of using the s3 api, you just save files in a standard (virtual) file system? Any other benefits or reliability/performance drawbacks?Maybe to avoid uuids and use standard fs paths? load replies (2)
garganzol|3 years ago
mixmastamyk|3 years ago
Maybe to avoid uuids and use standard fs paths?