top | item 33745618

(no title)

sbf501 | 3 years ago

Oh it is totally passive-aggressive coersion.

The notion of "poor performers" is a sign of bad management. They bloat the company to where they can no longer get their billion dollar handouts, er, payouts, and then take it out on people who actually care about their jobs and claim they are "poor" at it. While scaring the shit out of everyone else.

I know there are going to be a bunch of bros who think, "Yeah, that's not me, I'm fucking Tony Stark," but in reality, part of their brain will noodle on this gaslighting whether they want it to or not. So it really affects everyone.

It is a sign of toxic rot in a culture when they start branding people this way. But it's Amazon, it's a synonym for toxic.

discuss

sokoloff|3 years ago

> But it's Amazon, it's a synonym for toxic.

You realize this article is about Google, right?

sbf501|3 years ago

To the three of you that told me this. You are correct, it is Google. Is there a difference? (Rhetorical)

akamaozu|3 years ago

Company in question is Google, not Amazon.

josteink|3 years ago

> But it's Amazon, it's a synonym for toxic.

Eh. This article was about Google.