[philovivero]

No-one believes either of those things. You should familiarise yourself with the arguments and beliefs of people outside your ideological bubble.

To be charitable, I suppose what you mean is: "I don't believe gays/blacks are being genuine in their efforts to promote their agendas" and "there has been significant election interference, including against my preferred candidate (Trump|Clinton)."

Note that the latter belief is also widely held by those who preferred eg Clinton in 2016, including Clinton herself, who has loudly and proudly declared repeatedly that she would/should have been president but for election interference.

So if the latter belief is enough to get someone canceled from their job, and you support that, then I guess that includes about 90% of the population. I don't think you're being reasonable here.

As to the former belief, I think looking back at how Black Lives Matter has turned out should be enough to convince most reasonable people that some of the biggest/loudest agendas promoted over the past few years aren't genuine.

As to your last assertion, you're correct. No-one is getting canceled over minor quibbles over tax rates. I don't know anyone who is claiming that.

[drewbug01]

> No-one believes either of those things.

“No-one” is a pretty broad claim, yeah?

> including Clinton herself, who has loudly and proudly declared repeatedly that she would/should have been president but for election interference.

The point you make is interesting, but surely there are pretty big differences in those two situations? Are they really identical in any way? I would be curious to know why they are the same thing and can be compared with each other like this - from my point of view, I don’t think I could agree.

[amanaplanacanal]

There have been plenty of claims that people have been kicked off social media because they are conservative.