(no title)
Knufen | 3 years ago
1. Eating and drinking from plastics (This includes aluminum cans which are plastic lined) [a]
2. Heating food in ANY type of plastic [a]
3. Caffein intake [b]
4. Sugar intake [c]
5. NOT exercising regularly [d]
6. Alcohol [e]
7. Age [f]
8. Stress [g]
9. Soy products or other natural products containing phytoestrogens [h]
I edited the comment to add point 8 and 9.
Funnily enough these goes for both genders regarding fertility. If you are considering having a child, it takes approximately 7 months for sperm to fully develop so better to change lifestyle sooner rather than later.
a. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222987 b. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482951/ c. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35606632/ d. https://rep.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/rep/153/2/157.x... e. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28029592/ f. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3253726/ g. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6260894/ h. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18650557/
colordrops|3 years ago
steve_adams_86|3 years ago
Soy seems to fall well within the parameters of “this is fine”, but people readily take any example of it effecting our physiology as evidence of it being harmful. In reality, the evidence of it promoting health overall is extensive and strong.
It could be a component of a plant-based diet for example, which is shown to lead to lower BMI (great for sperm and overall health outcomes). It may reduce sperm concentration to a small degree in large volumes, but the chances are good (statistically speaking) that swapping out something worse in your diet for soy would be a net positive.
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]
amelius|3 years ago
s1artibartfast|3 years ago
ipdashc|3 years ago
> Semen parameters did not seem affected by caffeine intake, at least caffeine from coffee, tea and cocoa drinks, in most studies. Conversely, other contributions suggested a negative effect of cola-containing beverages and caffeine-containing soft drinks on semen volume, count and concentration.
If tea and coffee don't cause an effect, but cola and soft drinks do, doesn't that imply it's sugar, not caffeine?
Knufen|3 years ago
et-al|3 years ago
Anyways, I still think sedentary lifestyles and stress play a larger role than plastics, but those are harder to isolate and control for researchers.
pdpi|3 years ago
> 2. As regards sperm DNA defects, caffeine intake seemed associated with aneuploidy and DNA breaks, but not with other markers of DNA damage > 3. Finally, male coffee drinking was associated to prolonged time to pregnancy in some, but not all, studies.
And then goes on to conclude:
> The literature suggests that caffeine intake, possibly through sperm DNA damage, may negatively affect male reproductive function.
The whole abstract points at weak/inconclusive results, but we're definitely talking about caffeine here, not sugar.
ljf|3 years ago
UglyToad|3 years ago
As far as I'm aware the evidence just isn't there with respect to soy and cherry picking the single study that shows some potential link is just helping fuel a dietary myth, would be my view.
dang|3 years ago
This is particularly important when correcting misimpressions. If your comment is neutral, the neutral reader can absorb the new information fairly easily. But if you're hostile (as with "ah yes, that, definitely that"), then you're also signaling a pre-existing battle. The neutral reader gets confused by these mixed signals and feels caught in crossfire, which is not a state that's good for learning.
The upside of battle language is that it rallies any readers who are already on your side, but this is not a good move in the HN game. We want curious conversation here, not escalating intensity or repetition of already hardened positions. The value of curious conversation can perhaps be measured by how much the participants, including the silent readers, move in the process.
Klonoar|3 years ago
This and seed oils get hit with the exact same playbook, then disregard significant chunks of the world that have zero issues with them.
35amxn35|3 years ago
lr4444lr|3 years ago
Does BPA-free plastic improve anything? What about containers of non-prepared food? I can see not eating directly from any, but I think it's pretty hard in the developed world to rid ourselves of plastics entirely in the storage of foodstuffs.
Also, do we know whether the changes in sperm quality you mention affect congenital childhood maladies? (I realize this is probably beyond your field somewhat.)
Scaevolus|3 years ago
Silicone tends to not have endocrine disruptors because it doesn't need plasticizers.
[1]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492270/
Knufen|3 years ago
And sperm quality mostly affect fertility. The egg and the body if the woman is incredibly effective at selecting quality sperm and rejecting bad sperm. There are multiple guidance systems for sperm which selects for good quality [b].
a. https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/endocrine/ind... b. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sperm_guidance
lm28469|3 years ago
Wait until you learn about ink contamination from food nets and cardboard boxes.
throw0101a|3 years ago
So drinking containers should generally be ceramic, glass, or stainless steel?
yamtaddle|3 years ago
Even water supplies in a house will typically have been in contact with plastics—at the treatment plant, in the house for any modern house (they're pretty much all PEX now, since it's stupid-easy and fast to install, which means it's very cheap), in the hot water heater if they're any hot water mixed in (ever start with a hot tap for water you're gonna boil?), if you've got a filter system that's almost certainly full of plastic, and so on.
You'd also have to avoid canned goods of all kinds, not just bottled/canned drinks. Store-bought canned foods have plastic liners, which all but completely solved problems with canned-good spoilage that we used to have, but does mean ~all canned goods are sitting in plastic, not metal, effectively. Glass-canned might be better but are usually more expensive and there's still plastic on the inside of the lids (how much that matters, I do not know—I'd expect very little, but sometimes these things are surprising, for all I know those inside-the-lids bits use exceptionally awful plastic or something).
mauvehaus|3 years ago
[0] https://www.snowpeak.com/collections/drinkware/products/tita... There are many. This is my favorite.
[1] https://chemistrytalk.org/titanium-anodizing/
Knufen|3 years ago
mc32|3 years ago
dj_mc_merlin|3 years ago
themagician|3 years ago
danuker|3 years ago
grammers|3 years ago
mikodin|3 years ago
Like most things - eliminating the highest points of contact likely would suffice.
Daily habits are the ones that matter.
Are you drinking from a plastic water bottle everyday? Is your water filter plastic? Are you drinking coffee from a keurig or similar? Are you storing food in plastic containers? Are you heating food in plastic containers? Are you using plastic utencils? Are you using plastic lined pans? Are you buying food wrapped in plastic?
Etc etc.
It's a good starting place...then get your sperm tested, it's not prohibitively expensive.
siglesias|3 years ago
1) https://amzn.to/3H2YadV
SoftTalker|3 years ago
I personally use a hard (i.e. not squeezable) plastic bottle, that I fill with cold/cool water just before use. As long as the water has not been sitting in the bottle for days or in the sun or in a hot car, etc. I don't think there is enough potential chemical leeching to worry about.
Bud|3 years ago
They don't break.
I do have some glass bottles as well for occasional use by guests, but when on the go, the popular metal water bottles seem best.
zhynn|3 years ago
irusensei|3 years ago
> 7. Age [f]
wait wat
nzealand|3 years ago
simonsarris|3 years ago
majkinetor|3 years ago
agilob|3 years ago
danuker|3 years ago
bluGill|3 years ago
moffkalast|3 years ago
citizenpaul|3 years ago
Can you explain this more? I was under the impression it took something like 60days for sperm to generate in the body.
mclightning|3 years ago
[deleted]
10g1k|3 years ago
torginus|3 years ago
Why is this so rarely discussed?
steve_adams_86|3 years ago
irrational|3 years ago
faximile|3 years ago
Can you suggest any reputable sources for keeping up to date with these best practices, from a consumer PoV?
grammers|3 years ago
> Because we can identify existing, relatively inexpensive monomers and additives that do not exhibit EA, even when stressed, we believe that plastics having comparable physical properties but that do not release chemicals having detectable EA could be produced at minimal additional cost.
The only question that I have left: Why aren't we doing this already???
Aachen|3 years ago
concinds|3 years ago
mikenew|3 years ago
There's a very good interview on the topic here: https://youtu.be/V02z9mqTWzg
adrian_b|3 years ago
The great danger that has been created by the availability of cheap refined sugar and similar sweeteners, like HFCS, is that it has become extremely easy to create food that has an unnaturally high concentration of sugar or fructose and that it has become extremely easy to eat an excessive amount of sugar per day.
Most cultivated fruits contain around 10% sugar, while a few are sweeter than that, with up to around 16% sugar, like grapes, fresh figs or fresh dates.
When eating only fresh fruits or defrozen fruits, it is unlikely to eat too much sugar, but it is still possible.
It is recommended that the daily intake of sugar should not exceed around 50 g (i.e. around 25 g fructose).
That corresponds to around 300 g of grapes, or around 500 g of apples or pears or blueberries (or most other fruits), so eating amounts less or equal with these every day should be safe.
On the other hand, a single chocolate might contain over 60 g of sugar. Most industrially-made food, including juices or yogurts or breakfast cereals, contains excessive amounts of sugar, so many people eat daily 100 to 200 g of sugar, or even more, without being aware of this.
When eating dried fruits or honey, it is also possible to eat too much sugar without a lot of effort, e.g. around 80 g of most dried fruits is enough to provide the maximum recommended daily intake of sugar.
majkinetor|3 years ago
agilob|3 years ago
moffkalast|3 years ago
commandlinefan|3 years ago
Well, I'm trying my best...
Conscat|3 years ago
faximile|3 years ago
TurkishPoptart|3 years ago
How do we avoid this? So no Costco plastic water bottles, ever.
thedorkknight|3 years ago
>7. Age
I find this to be the hardest one to avoid!
Teknoman117|3 years ago
Eat meat, increase risk of heart disease. Eat soy, decrease fertility.
Life is weird to me. Humans have one of the longest lifespans among mammals, yet we seem to start breaking down not all that far into it. We don't tend to consider 35 "old", as we regularly live 80+ years, and even if you consider the "generally well functioning" span of your life to be your years up to 60 or so, 35 is barely past half way.
Oh well.
jahewson|3 years ago
brushfoot|3 years ago
Either way, soy vs. meat is not the dichotomy it's sometimes presented as in political narratives. You can eliminate both and still have a huge number of healthy world foods to choose from. The Mediterranean I had recently was delicious and soy and meat free.
[0]: https://www.jwatch.org/jw200808070000002/2008/08/07/do-soy-f...
lm28469|3 years ago
moffkalast|3 years ago
tdaltonc|3 years ago
But at a population level, which of those are actually driving meaningful fertility decline?
FollowingTheDao|3 years ago
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S230505001...
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016041202...
ceedan|3 years ago
DoingIsLearning|3 years ago
That's paracetamol for the rest of the world in case you were confused like I was.
SoftTalker|3 years ago
aidenn0|3 years ago
So eating and drinking from plastics lowers sperm quality in women too?
Knufen|3 years ago
sc90|3 years ago
sizzle|3 years ago
spacedcowboy|3 years ago
addingadimensio|3 years ago
Knufen|3 years ago
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC122794/
kccoder|3 years ago
asguy|3 years ago
creaturemachine|3 years ago
tdehnel|3 years ago
rafaelero|3 years ago