[zenbai]

Solid JS is what I would have chosen. Not sure if they considered it. Best performance and dev experience with least 'magic' of all frameworks I've tried.

[swyx]

what do you like about the dev experience? i have a hard time seeing solid as something more than “react but faster and slightly less annoying”.

still doesnt have scoped styles, animation, state mgmt, head management, etc out of the box, all minimum things i look for to be productive

[hakre]

> i have a hard time seeing solid as something more than “react but faster and slightly less annoying”.

Err, I'd have a hard time not to see that as a major benefit first of all?

[richeyryan]

Solid does have state management. Its state management primitives can be used outside components and can even be used completely on their own, and its stores are fairly similar to Svelte stores.

https://www.solidjs.com/docs/latest/api#stores

[jakelazaroff]

They recently released a beta of SolidStart, their answer to Next.js/SvelteKit/Remix, etc, and I’ve been really liking it. A lot of good ideas pulled from the other frameworks. https://www.solidjs.com/blog/introducing-solidstart

[ptrwis]

For animations, the standard Web Animation API is very convenient. From what I can see, the animation library in Svelte looks pretty similar.

[hakre]

At least it was on top within the timeline-strings-percentage-bubbles graphic.

And as the latest and greatest omnipotent entry in it, so my guess would be theirs authors were aware of it.

/edit: thanks for pointing me to solid, it shined a lot of light to me in context of the article.