top | item 33832588

(no title)

throwup | 3 years ago

The interesting thing is that FTX had almost no retail customers in the US[1], yet most of the coverage has been US-focused, due to the VC investors and US political donations. It really was just investors (in the company itself) that got hit the hardest. It just goes to show how easy it is to buy media coverage. If the media talked about things that affected their readers rather than their owners, the FTX news cycle wouldn't have lasted one day before everybody moved on.

[1]: https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/d8/images/canvas/...

discuss

order

ac29|3 years ago

> The interesting thing is that FTX had almost no retail customers in the US[1]

This is only true if you believe the massive amounts of customers in the Cayman Islands, Virgin Islands, etc were not just US persons' shell companies.

luckylion|3 years ago

Is it common for retail investors in the US to create shell companies in the Cayman Islands etc? Is that a service offered at low cost that everybody uses to get around so regulatory hurdle, like using a VPN to get around simple geofencing on streaming platforms?

HDThoreaun|3 years ago

Those wouldn't be retail customers in the US though, they'd be customers in the Cayman Islands...

jandrese|3 years ago

It's pretty hard to feel bad for tax dodging fat cats getting bitten by a con man though.

skybrian|3 years ago

This is kind of a weird argument. There's no reason US reporters or commenters shouldn't write about things that happen in other countries, if they find it interesting. The FTX scandal is fascinating for lots of reasons.

(I've also seen coverage about how it affected the Bahamas.)

benjaminwootton|3 years ago

As I post on many threads, I have barely heard a single story about retail losing money on FTX, whereas I personally knew a handful who lost money with LUNA. I assume institutions are holding the vast majority of the bags here.

hi5eyes|3 years ago

common joke amongst ct natives is that left curves got rekt in luna, while right curves got rekt in ftx. interesting to see it commonly admitted by corresponding market participants

makestuff|3 years ago

So FTX was just a bunch of institutional traders trading against each other? Sounds a lot like a dark pool.

chollida1|3 years ago

> So FTX was just a bunch of institutional traders trading against each other? Sounds a lot like a dark pool.

A dark pool has nothing to do with who trades in it. As GME made famous, alot of GME retail orders got sent to dark pools to trade on.

What distinguishes a dark pool from a lit exchange is that orders are hidden and often trade at the midpoint(half penny) and not on the penny.

Who is on the exchange has nothing to do with dark vs lit.

fasthands9|3 years ago

This is what has befuddled me.

I still wager the main con was more similar to classic VC frauds where you pump up your user numbers and trade volume in order to get more investment dollars (which you can then spend on anything). Advertising on sports arenas and stuff gave them a lot of plausibility as the "big player" to people (like me) who dont trade crypto at all.

itronitron|3 years ago

Yeah, I wonder if the investors bought the media coverage in addition to paying for it (intentionally or not.)

basch|3 years ago

I believe it is more "give the people what they want." This story is getting clicks because the numbers are so big it has everybody daydreaming about having lived through this from the inside. People want details to fill in the cracks of their fantasies.

This is like Nightcrawler, and the press is satisfying the bloodlust of its readers who like The Social Network like drama and Big Shortesque scandals.

We arent living in the right reality if Adam McKay/Charles Randolph/Michael Lewis and Aaron Sorkin/David Fincher/Ben Mezrich dont have dueling FTX movies coming out on opposite streaming services the same week. (Probably Apple and Disney, who then happen to announce a merger, because of course thats how the world works now.)

dmix|3 years ago

All media is super US focused.

“World news” is code word for “non-US news” since US is the default, which makes sense.

tsimionescu|3 years ago

In every country, world news very explicitly means news about what's happening outside that country.